Re: [Wireshark-dev] First MSVC2005EE build - very smooth - thank you

2007-02-08 Thread Bill Meier
I would like to second that! I have been building with MSVC2005EE for the last 10 days or so without any issues at all. So, I don't need to keep dual booting to test my changes :-) Prokash, you don't normally need to enter the IDE at all. Most of the building is done from the command-line

[Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] RTP with MP2T payload bug fix

2007-02-08 Thread Mark Lewis
The current RTP/MPEG2 Transport Stream dissector has a bug. When both Adaptation Field and Payload are present in a packet (AFC==3) the payload is ignored and Wireshark marks the packet as malformed. This patch to epan/dissectors/packet-mp2t.c fixes the problem. It has been tested on Windows

Re: [Wireshark-dev] FILETIME

2007-02-08 Thread Gerhard Gappmeier
sounds good, but I don't know to use that in my plugin. I get unresolved external error for that function. It tried to link dissectors.lib from epan/dissectors but this causes even more linker errors. Guy Harris schrieb: Gerhard Gappmeier wrote: is there a simple way to handle windows

[Wireshark-dev] ucd-snmp support dropped

2007-02-08 Thread Radek Vokál
When and why was dropped ucd-snmp support? The configuration option disappeared in 0.99.5 but I suspect the support was removed sooner. Radek -- Radek Vokál [EMAIL PROTECTED] Base OS Engineering - Team Lead Office: +420 541 426 132 Red Hat Inc.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] First MSVC2005EE build - very smooth - thank you

2007-02-08 Thread Prokash Sinha
Thank you all. I will try following the document. I have svn installed. -pro On 2/8/07, Abhik Sarkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to second that! I have been building with MSVC2005EE for the last 10 days or so without any issues at all. So, I don't need to keep dual booting to test

[Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Add FP support fo K12xx

2007-02-08 Thread Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
Hello In the attached patch, the K12 wiretap now saves the content of record after captured packet data. The K12 dissector then could extract them and provide useful information to properly dissect FP frames (user plane of UTRAN Iub interface). This patch only touches K12's part. There are a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Add FP support fo K12xx

2007-02-08 Thread Martin Mathieson
This patch only touches K12's part. There are a few parameters for FP that the patch still does not provide together with my idea for future work: - The UMTS release number - This will go into a preference setting. FP dissector should use a default release from preference when it is not given

Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark build error

2007-02-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Gesendet: 08.02.07 15:04:02 An: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Betreff: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark build error Hello, I just updated wirkshark to the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Add expert info in DMP

2007-02-08 Thread Graeme Lunt
Stig, Your patches for X.411, CDT, DMP and P_MUL all checked. Thanks, Graeme -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stig Bjørlykke Sent: 05 February 2007 18:13 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH]

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ucd-snmp support dropped

2007-02-08 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:52:04PM +0100, Radek Vokál wrote: When and why was dropped ucd-snmp support? The configuration option disappeared in 0.99.5 but I suspect the support was removed sooner. Not by much. As to why: That was discussed on this list:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packet Storage

2007-02-08 Thread Guy Harris
Anergy Virt wrote: I want to run dissector on certain packets in the stream of packets. What is the ultimate goal you are trying to accomplish here? Is it possible to store the pointers to packet data and call dissector later for those packets only? No. or the only possibility is to

[Wireshark-dev] SCTP Reassembly

2007-02-08 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Has anybody done something about SCTP reassembly? I think something was mentioned on the list a while back but nothing looks to have been implemented. BR Anders ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector pipelines suggestion

2007-02-08 Thread Shehjar Tikoo
Hi all, Shehjar Tikoo wrote: Guy Harris wrote: On Feb 6, 2007, at 3:56 PM, Shehjar Tikoo wrote: Note: anonymizing packets isn't what a dissector does; a dissector dissects packets. If you want hooks to do anonymization that understands particular protocols, the way to do that would be