Sake Blok wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:45:42AM +0800, Jeff Morriss wrote:
I did however start to look into the code to see how I could implement
the extra field. I realise that I need to start to understand how
wireshark actually handles frames. Some fields are filled by the
dissector
Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:58:26AM +0100, Sake Blok wrote:
I have not seen many
patches being overlooked actually. There were the occasions where a review
lasted a little longer, but most patches were commited within a couple of
days. Maybe a patch-tracking system is a
Hi,
[Please don't send Excel docs to the mailing list--especially if they
contain a picture. Not everyone has high speed Internet connections and
not everyone can read Excel docs.]
sara vanan wrote:
[...]
/home/saravanan/ethereal-0.99.0/tethereal -c 10 port 53
Capturing on eth0
[...]
it
Ok,
Here after I will not send any attachments to the wireshark developer list.
Sorry for attaching the excel sheet.
On 3/20/07, Jeff Morriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[Please don't send Excel docs to the mailing list--especially if they
contain a picture. Not everyone has high speed
Hi,
I am doing a DNS proxy for IPV6. For this I have to get the destination
IP(DNS Sever IP stored in the client PC.
I am trying to use Wireshark source code for getting the desdtination IP.
for example
client IP - 192.168.16.67DNS ( destination IP) - 192.168.16.106
By using the
Jeff Morriss wrote:
In fact I meant it just as a stop-gap until someone (smarter--or at
least with more than to dedicate to the purpose--than me) can fix
Wireshark's unsigned-vs-signed char problem.
As it is, I have to scroll through hundreds of (probably not fixable by
me) warnings just
Is your question somehow related to development of Wireshark?
I am afraid you are not asking at the best place.
Purpose of Wireshark is to analyze packets. The command mentioned below
gives brief display of the data. If you do not need all that info,
consider using other commands to process it
Ulf Lamping wrote:
I just meant that in the long run just ignoring a long list of warnings
is probably not a good idea ...
However, disabling the signed warning, fix the rest and setting the
stop on error barrier would still be a lot better than what we
currently have ...
I heartily
Currently, you don't tend to even notice new warnings that you introduce
on your own platform, as they get lost in the general compilation noise.
Part of the problem (when working from the command-line at least) is
how much output is generated, and how far you'd need to scroll back to
see the
Getting rid of warnings should not be confused with getting rid of the
*reasons* for those warnings.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Typically when a software vendor says that a product is intuitive he
means the exact opposite.
pgpomulJckxPF.pgp
Description: PGP
Inline comments...
On 3/20/07, Martin Mathieson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, you don't tend to even notice new warnings that you introduce
on your own platform, as they get lost in the general compilation noise.
Part of the problem (when working from the command-line at least) is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
The last two months I have been working on a SHIM6 enabled version of
Wireshark. The subject of my final thesis is about SHIM6 and I needed to
analyze the SHIM6 communication exchange. SHIM6 is an IPv6 based
solution for
I think most the proto_tree_add_text could be replaced by
proto_tree_add_item which could allow (i.e. at least Sébastien Barré ;))
to perform an easy search on specific items. ;)
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
Matthijs Mekking wrote:
Hello,
The last two months I have been working on a SHIM6
Hi,
Does anyone have idl2eth version for windows? I am stuck with linux
version that is usable but only on linux.
Does anyone have some other solution??? I need to create plugin for
wireshark, to monitor my CORBA traffic...
Thanks in advance,
Kristijan
Hi ,
I have written a dissector, compiled and tested it( no problems). But
the same dissector when used by somebody else at a different location is
giving compilation
problems. They are using the same OS (RHEL 4) and the same compiler
version as ours. It is giving the following error:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:04:49AM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
In my experience having a compiler warning free code is a good way to
prevent very subtle bugs and would also be a good addition to the
programs security - and BTW more pleasant to work with ;-)
Indeed.
So here comes the
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
As usual, this is my Win32 point of view. I'm pretty sure the
above is possible to do for the Win32 platform. I'm not sure if it's
possible with the automake foo for the different unix/linux platform
builds ...
With
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:44:06PM +, Martin Mathieson wrote:
Part of the problem (when working from the command-line at least) is
how much output is generated, and how far you'd need to scroll back to
see the compilation of the file you've just changed.
Yup. I edit source files and
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 05:47:59PM +0800, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Sake Blok wrote:
I assigned the bug to myself, I hope that is the proper way to use
bugzilla (as this is my first time to write code to solve an
already listed bug).
I don't know if there is a proper way but I will mention
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:24:10AM +0100, Sake Blok wrote:
OK, I think an extra field needs to be added to the frame-dissector so
that both delta's are available, also for filtering, searching and
coloring. It would also be nice to be able to have both fields available
for the columns in the
I believe the issue could be reported to Cisco TAC requesting
correction, instead of hacking heuristics. At the other hand,
did they announce somewhere that they are using libpcap format?
I was googling a bit and found indications how to convert the file
On 3/21/07, Stephen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:44:06PM +, Martin Mathieson wrote:
Yup. I edit source files and compile in the Emacs GUI. It makes it
easy to spot warnings errors during the compliation process (Control-X
` takes you to the next warning or
On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:21 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
How do you mean? Emacs is the only true editor!
No, it's not:
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
Of course, this assumes that all the C compilers we use accept -
Werror.
I doubt that they do (and they definitely don't, if by we you mean
everybody who compiles Wireshark - it's been compiled with Sun C,
HP's ANSI C compiler for HP-UX,
Did you see my answer to your question in your previous email? (At the
top of the email I said something about the Excel doc but I tried to
answer your question below that.)
sara vanan wrote:
Hi,
I am doing a DNS proxy for IPV6. For this I have to get the destination
IP(DNS Sever IP
On 3/21/07, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:21 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
How do you mean? Emacs is the only true editor!
No, it's not:
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html
There *must* be an ed mode for emacs. so the point is that...
After some
Joerg Mayer wrote:
No, it won't work. I've spent many many hours in the past to get rid of
compiler warnings and it just won't work. While we definitely should try
to get rid of some warnings, fixing warnings on one platform may introduce
warnings on other platforms (or even gcc versions).
27 matches
Mail list logo
