Hi Aaron,
thanks for the fix. I have committed it (with whitespace changes).
Best regards
Michael
On May 22, 2009, at 12:48 AM, Aaron Turner wrote:
Looks like there was a bug where WTAP codes weren't being properly
converted to DLT types and since ethernet == ethernet, that worked,
but most
Hi.
Out of interest, are there supposed to be issues with Ethernet Pcap-NG
files/packets appended to other Pcap-NG files generated with Wireshark 1.0.7
having an unrecognised link type in later (SVN) versions of Wireshark? At
the same time, it seems that 1.0.7 has issues reading packets in Pcap-NG
Thanks for all answers,
Olivier
Stephen Fisher a écrit :
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 05:23:52PM +0200, wsgd wrote:
Into a plugin dissector,
how do I know that :
- a new capture has been started
- a new file is loaded
reset callback of register_tap_listener ?
other possibilities ?
Can
Peter Harris wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
Next week I plan on releasing 1.2.0rc1 and 1.0.8. The 1.2.0rc1 release
will include creating a /trunk-1.2 branch in SVN. If you need me to
postpone the branch or release, please let me know.
I've started working on
Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:32:49AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
In there is also a warning message by dumpcap that seems quite
unnecessary (useless?) to me - at least when I run wireshark with the
-r option. That may be something to be done before 1.2.
Is it this
Hi Tyson,
1.0.7 does only support one section header and one interface header at
the
beginning of the pcapng file. The current svn version, allows one
section
header at the beginning and multiple interface headers, but not multiple
sections headers. Basically, Wireshark (the svn version) can
Hi Michael. Thanks for clarifying that for me.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Michael Tüxen
michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote:
Hi Tyson,
1.0.7 does only support one section header and one interface header at
the
beginning of the pcapng file. The current svn version, allows one
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Peter Harris wrote:
Is there any chance of applying the patch in
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2981
(X11 extension dissection support) for 1.2?
I was reviewing that for a while but have had virtually no time of late
