[Wireshark-dev] TCP segmentation loss

Dear All, I have recently been building a dissector for an 3GPP ASN.1 based protocol which uses a tcp based transport. I have followed the developer's guide (9.4) relating to the re-assembly of fragments, and this seems to work fine. However, after a tcp segment loss ( I have the preference

Re: [Wireshark-dev] TCP segmentation loss

Hi, I think the TCP reassembly has problems with out-of-sequence messages. Do you plan to submit your dissector to us? Which 3GPP protocol is it for? You could submit the asn1 .cnf template files etc ( e.g the files that go in /asn1/xx/) to be worked on in the SVN tree in that way we could see

[Wireshark-dev] Program test

Hi ! I need, your help, To test my projecy, I need to create a communication between a server and a client with UDP. I took a source code of python, but wireshark don't capture the communication. I give you the python code that i used. Thank you for your help Rémy serveur.py Description:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Program test

Hi, Wireshark can't see communications on your Windows loopback interface. Please run client and serveur on different platfoms. Thanx, Jaap Sent from my iPhone On 4 jun 2009, at 10:43, POINTEAU Remy remy.point...@tech.viveris.com wrote: Hi ! I need, your help, To test my projecy, I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch supplied for wiretap/Makefile.nmake

Peter Johansson wrote: The current version of wiretap/Makefile.nmake attempts to compile ascend-grammar.h as if it were a .c file. The attached patch corrects this issue. Best regards, Peter Thanks for the report. Digging a bit deeper: it turned out that the dependency on the .h file

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is anonsvn.wireshark.org Sick?

I haven't seen any problems on the server side. FWIW, the Buildbot system uses the anonsvn server and hasn't had any issues. If you need to, contact me offline with your external IP address and I'll check the server logs. Bryant Eastham wrote: All- I have been having a horrible time

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations are missing from lua bindings?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Sam Roberts vieuxt...@gmail.com wrote: At least, I can't find any lua bindings for accessing bit fields, am I missing them? Wireshark has no bitwise operators implemented for Lua bindings yet, so this is a correct observation. I don't think it should involve too

[Wireshark-dev] Help with adding/displaying a particular type of field to a subtree

Group, I'm having problems trying to figure out how to add/display a particular type field to a subtree . It seems no matter what I try I keep getting the following error in the Packets Detail windows: [Dissector bug, protocol SMART: proto .c:1006: failed assertion

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help with adding/displaying a particular type of field to a subtree

Hi, FT_BYTES, BASE_NONE Thanx, Jaap fsch...@comcast.net wrote: Group, I'm having problems trying to figure out how to add/display a particular type field to a subtree. It seems no matter what I try I keep getting the following error in the Packets Detail windows: [Dissector

Re: [Wireshark-dev] TCP segmentation loss

Hi Anders, Hi All, Thanks for that I will keep that in mind. I will need to ask our client. Presently, the dissector code contains very little logic: There is the ASN.1 specification, A configuration file which comprises of a reference to the PDU, and a -template.c which has the basic

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations are missing from lua bindings?

A quick test shows that it's very easy to add bitop to wslua. Copy bit.c to epan/wslua/ and apply the attached patch. Then make as usual. -- Stig Bjørlykke wslua-bit.patch Description: Binary data ___ Sent via:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch supplied for wiretap/Makefile.nmake

Thanks for digging deeper! / Peter 2009/6/4 Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com Peter Johansson wrote: The current version of wiretap/Makefile.nmake attempts to compile ascend-grammar.h as if it were a .c file. The attached patch corrects this issue. Best regards, Peter Thanks for

[Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations are missing from lua bindings?

2009/6/4 Stig Bjørlykke s...@bjorlykke.org: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Sam Roberts vieuxt...@gmail.com wrote: At least, I can't find any lua bindings for accessing bit fields, am I missing them? Wireshark has no bitwise operators implemented for Lua bindings yet, so this is a correct

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Program test

or run the same program on Linux. (Wireshark/libpcap can capture loopback traffic on Linux) Regards, Martin martinvisse...@gmail.com On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi, Wireshark can't see communications on your Windows loopback interface.