Re: [Wireshark-dev] filters name : gmr1_xxx vs gmr1.xxx

2012-02-06 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, So far I had named the filters in the field definition like gmr1.bcch.xxx or gmr1.rr.xxx ... Looks reasonable to me. Regards Anders -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Sylvain Munaut Sent: den 5

[Wireshark-dev] CSN.1 [Re: Remaining Wireshak stuff during FOSDEM]

2012-02-06 Thread Mike Morrin
Sylvain Munaut wrote: - CSN1 decoding is manually coded right now - and wrong in some places. Automatic creation like ASN.1 possible but rather hard problem. Something pretty important to me is that the code can be modified to look nice. For eg. when you look at the TETRA dissectors

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Meeting minutes from (pre)FOSDEM meeting

2012-02-06 Thread Graham Bloice
So: Do you think fixing the current Makefile.nmake to be able to do out-of- tree builds is worth any effort ? I think I read the above to indicate no (or maybe: wait until non-cygwin name is complete and then fix that ?) My personal feeling is that CMake is the way to go, and that the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow sip voip flow for large captures

2012-02-06 Thread Cristian Constantin
cristian: done. here is the bug report: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6794 On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Anders Broman a.bro...@bredband.net wrote: Please add your patch as it is so we can have a look at it. Regards Anders Cristian Constantin skrev 2012-02-03 15:19:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Top 3 patches to review ;)

2012-02-06 Thread Tony Trinh
My opinion for 5575 https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5575is not [yet] (clarification and cleanup needed, especially for patch 7448https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7448 ). On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Anders Broman a.bro...@bredband.netwrote: Hi, I'd

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Meeting minutes from (pre)FOSDEM meeting

2012-02-06 Thread Jeff Morriss
Alexis La Goutte wrote: Thanks, for the minute ! On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de mailto:jma...@loplof.de wrote: [...] i10n: - for the GUI OK - for the dissectors not OK - if someone wants to do it: don't stop him or her I work on this topic

[Wireshark-dev] User-Customisable Payload Dissection

2012-02-06 Thread Tyson Key
Hi, Now that the GSM SIM/ISO 7816 protocol dissector has been integrated, it might be useful to provide a Payload Protocol option for the CCID dissector - so that users can switch appropriately between treating payloads as either plain data, or as GSM SIM/ISO 7816 packets. With that in mind,

[Wireshark-dev] [RFC] bug 6797 : proto: Add proto_tree_add_split_{uint, int} helpers for non contiguous int fields

2012-02-06 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi, Anders Broman suggested I post here to get more feedback. This adds a helper in proto.c to display fields where you have to go grab bits at several places (within a 32 bits word) to make the value. This doesn't recover the value of the field itself, it just takes care of the formating

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40877: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dns.c

2012-02-06 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:36:23PM +, alagou...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40877 From https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6704 DNS KEY RDATA contains an extra Key id field Set Key Id is a generated item (in