Hi,
any idea what is wrong? Wireshark 1.8.2 didn't report this.
tshark -v
OOPS: dissector table sctp.ppi doesn't exist
Protocol being registered is Datagram Transport Layer Security
TShark 1.8.3 (SVN Rev 45256 from /trunk-1.8)
Copyright 1998-2012 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org and
2012/10/4 Petr Sumbera petr.sumb...@oracle.com
Hi,
any idea what is wrong? Wireshark 1.8.2 didn't report this.
tshark -v
OOPS: dissector table sctp.ppi doesn't exist
Protocol being registered is Datagram Transport Layer Security
TShark 1.8.3 (SVN Rev 45256 from /trunk-1.8)
Copyright
On 2012-10-04 14:32, Pascal Quantin wrote:
2012/10/4 Petr Sumbera petr.sumb...@oracle.com
Hi,
any idea what is wrong? Wireshark 1.8.2 didn't report this.
tshark -v
OOPS: dissector table sctp.ppi doesn't exist
Protocol being registered is Datagram Transport Layer Security
TShark 1.8.3 (SVN
Hi,
should the order in which we include files make any difference?
#include epan/packet.h
#include epan/expert.h
- ok
#include epan/expert.h
#include epan/packet.h
- failure
expert.h needs packet_info.h, which is included by packet.h
Trivial fix is of course to include packet_info.h in
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Martin Kaiser li...@kaiser.cx wrote:
Hi,
should the order in which we include files make any difference?
#include epan/packet.h
#include epan/expert.h
- ok
#include epan/expert.h
#include epan/packet.h
- failure
expert.h needs packet_info.h, which is
Hi folks,
This patch contains code to handle the first two entries, which seem
to be SMB_INFO_STANDARD and SMB_INFO_QUERY_EA_SIZE, as well as the
patch I sent yesterday ...
I will probably not change anything more at this point, although I
notice that the dissector does not handle