On 11 December 2013 07:38, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to move the plugins/ directory into epan/dissectors/. They provide
just more dissectors and depend on epan anyway.
Are there good reasons not to do that move?
And could some of those plugins not be made into
Thus wrote Joerg Mayer (jma...@loplof.de):
I'd like to move the plugins/ directory into epan/dissectors/. They provide
just more dissectors and depend on epan anyway.
Are there good reasons not to do that move?
Couldn't we have plugins for fileformats (wiretap) or taps as well?
Also there is a reason to kept HAVE_PLUGINS ? (There is some people build
wireshark without plugins ?)
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Martin Kaiser li...@kaiser.cx wrote:
Thus wrote Joerg Mayer (jma...@loplof.de):
I'd like to move the plugins/ directory into epan/dissectors/. They
2013/12/11 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9406
Can anybody at all reproduce this one? Gerald, any thoughts on what
fuzzbot-specific config might be causing this?
Hi Evan,
I failed to reproduce it both on Linux x64 and Windows.
Hi,
As long as the plugins are buildable by themselves without having to link a
huge library and then into an executable, no objections from me.
But when I'm making something new and there are multiple compile and run events
per minute, having to wait for this library to be rebuild and linked,
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Graham Bloice
Sent: den 11 december 2013 09:24
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Move plugins/ to epan/dissectors/plugins/
On 11 December 2013 07:38, Joerg
Could I once again suggest sub-directories for all dissectors, as long
as we are on the subject of changing epan/dissectors?. It would make
development easier.
I would like to change the openSAFETY plugin to a
epan/dissectors/opensafety sub-directory
regard,
Roland
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:57
On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Sreejith M M sreejith...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like some problem with rpm creation.
The problem appears to be that the RPM was created with the dumpcap program
having some file capabilities set, and was unpacked into an NFS-mounted
directory, which means that the
I saw the recent change to 'tools/make-dissector-reg.py' to allow
reading list of files from a file; the argument dissectorsinfile. I find this
a bit awkward. Isn't it better to use the more familiar response-file syntax?
So the command to generate register.c would be something like:
On 11 December 2013 13:10, Gisle Vanem gva...@yahoo.no wrote:
I saw the recent change to 'tools/make-dissector-reg.py' to allow
reading list of files from a file; the argument dissectorsinfile. I find
this a bit awkward. Isn't it better to use the more familiar response-file
syntax? So the
Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com wrote:
and maybe due to my CMake ineptness it turned out to be one file per line.
How fast will CMake generate such a temp-file? There are approx 1100 packet-*.c
files. I figured this macro does it:
MACRO(REGISTER_DISSECTOR_FILES _outputfile
I compiled the whole code with:
./configure --prefix=/home2/rahul.rohit/1.10.3._standalone_ra/install
--disable-setcap-install --enable-setuid-install --with-libcap
--with-dumpcap-group=rncpet
But after installing the rpm, the machine is not able to find Wireshark (maybe
it's not properly
Vishnu Bhatt vishnu.bhatt@... writes:
I compiled the whole code with:
./configure --prefix=/home2/rahul.rohit/1.10.3._standalone_ra/install
--disable-setcap-install --enable-setuid-install --with-libcap
--with-dumpcap-group=rncpet
But after installing the rpm, the machine is not able to
HI,
I’m experiencing some difficulty installing. When I first downloaded your
package and read the installation notes, this computer didn’t have XQuartz on
it. So, I finished an installation, but got your message that the latest
xQuartz was required. No problem, I downloaded it, and when
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:38:30AM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
I'd like to move the plugins/ directory into epan/dissectors/. They provide
just more dissectors and depend on epan anyway.
Are there good reasons not to do that move?
Replying to self after reading the current state of feedback. OK,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:17:00PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:38:30AM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
I'd like to move the plugins/ directory into epan/dissectors/. They provide
just more dissectors and depend on epan anyway.
Are there good reasons not to do that move?
On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com wrote:
Also there is a reason to kept HAVE_PLUGINS ? (There is some people build
wireshark without plugins ?)
Wireshark is built without plugin support if either
1) GLib doesn't provide dynamic-loading support
I've been exploring a few options for the val_to_str function and
wmem. One of the tangential things I've been trying to achieve is to
make it into a macro so that the compiler will catch format-string
mismatches (which have been a source of bugs in the past). This is
easy to do inefficiently:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:22:31PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
I've been exploring a few options for the val_to_str function and
wmem. One of the tangential things I've been trying to achieve is to
make it into a macro so that the compiler will catch format-string
mismatches (which have been
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:22:31PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
I've been exploring a few options for the val_to_str function and
wmem. One of the tangential things I've been trying to achieve is to
make it into
On Dec 11, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Christopher Maynard
christopher.mayn...@gtech.com wrote:
Before running autogen.sh, did you modify
packaging/rpm/SPECS/wireshark.spec.in to meet your needs? Those are the
options that matter when creating the rpm.
Should
%bcond_without gtk2
the original function. I can use a single temp global, but that's just
ugly and won't work if we ever do multithreading.
It may be ugly, but using thread local storage for that global variable will
make it safe for multi-threading.
--
--- Dirk Jagdmann
http://cubic.org/~doj
-
22 matches
Mail list logo
