Yes, those are the tests I was referring to.
Well then it's all fine I guess. Thanks for clearing that up :)
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:45 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Antoine d'Otreppe a.dotre...@aspyct.org wrote:
>
&g
Hi all,
Half of my builds, those without PCAP, failed recently on travis during the
test step:
https://travis-ci.org/aspyct/wireshark/builds/469639514
(Mind you, they were broken before, but for a different reason).
The logs say, among other things:
"tshark: This version of TShark was not
Hi all,
Something about the ws_base32_decode function looks weird, and I'm a little
confused. Can I please have a sanity check? 2 things:
1. ws_base32_decode is actually an encode
2. it's not the standard base32 as defined in RFC4648
Let me explain.
1. It's actually an encode
The function is
e only implement function s
> that are actually needed.
>
> kind regards
> Roland
>
> Am Do., 29. Nov. 2018 um 09:35 Uhr schrieb Antoine d'Otreppe
> :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Still working on the syncthing dissector, I need a base32_encode.
>> I've
Hi all,
Still working on the syncthing dissector, I need a base32_encode.
I've noticed there's a wsutil/base32.c file, which contains a base32_decode.
Unfortunately I couldn't find the corresponding encode.
Do we have that
Spot on! Thanks Pascal!
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 15, 2018 10:14 PM, Pascal Quantin
wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 22:09, Antoine d'Otreppe a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi devs :)
>>
>> Small pickle here. Can you enlighten
Hi devs :)
Small pickle here. Can you enlighten me? Travis clang builds complain about my
format strings not using the right placeholders:
```
../epan/dissectors/packet-syncthing.c:156:57: error: format specifies type
'long' but the argument has type 'gint64' (aka 'long long')
Hmmm, yeah I saw the "do you want dynamic libs", and then I said no. Guess I
was tired... I'll try that! Thanks!
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, November 12, 2018 10:27 AM, Dario Lombardo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:40 AM Antoine d'Otreppe
> wrote:
>
>
Hi folks!
I'm progressing in the syncthing dissector. Wireshark compiled without hassle
on Manjaro (Arch derivative). I love the wireshark codebase, it's refreshing to
see a large project that just works...
Anyway I have two questions:
1. I'm not familiar with GDB and could not set a
Maciej
Am 09.11.18 um 09:52 schrieb Antoine d'Otreppe:
> Hi Peter, hi Anders,
>
> Thanks for the pointers! I'll look into it and report back here when I have
> more information on the topic.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Antoine
>
>
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Messa
gt;
> > From: Wireshark-dev wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org On Behalf Of Peter
> > Wu
> > Sent: den 9 november 2018 00:22
> > To: Antoine d'Otreppe a.dotre...@aspyct.org; Developer support list for
> > Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wiresh
Hi there,
I'm interested in learning more about wireshark in general, and in particular
learning how to make my own dissectors.
I just happened to find a protocol that doesn't seem to have any dissector for
it yet: syncthing. https://syncthing.net/
The local discovery protocol looks easy
12 matches
Mail list logo
