Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling bitfields withdifferent bitmask offsets ?

2007-11-14 Thread Neil Piercy
-Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronnie sahlberg Not tested! grab the hfinfo structure and modify the fields at runtime : header_field_info *hfinfo; hfinfo = proto_registrar_get_nth(hf_index); hfinfo-bitmask = new bitmask hfinfo-bitshift = new bit

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling bitfields withdifferent bitmask offsets ?

2007-11-14 Thread Martin Mathieson
I used the not-long-since-added proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val() in packet-umts_fp.c. There is also proto_tree_add_bits_item() which doesn't extract the value for you. Are these functions not suitable for your purpose? It certainly simplified the part of the code I needed it for. Martin On Nov