Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player on Windows/Qt 6.x do not play any sound

Hi,   When Wireshark 4.0.0 was released, users reported https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/18413. I verified it and it really happens, but I have no idea why: 1) It looks that Qt 6.x is the reason. Build with Qt 5.x works fine. But Qt 6.x code for audio play is very different

[Wireshark-dev] RTP player on Windows/Qt 6.x do not play any sound

Hi, When Wireshark 4.0.0 was released, users reported https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/18413. I verified it and it really happens, but I have no idea why: 1) It looks that Qt 6.x is the reason. Build with Qt 5.x works fine. But Qt 6.x code for audio play is very different

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Erik and I where having a discussion at Sharkfest about the player today. I would gladly help you guys solving the issues, the problem is just, that I neither have captures nor detailed explanations. I do think. Bugzilla may be a good point, but a step-by-step comparison between v1 and v2

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

On Nov 6, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Peter Budny via Wireshark-dev wrote: > I have plenty of captures handy, but it would probably be best if I record > some new ones to illustrate the problems more clearly. I could also write up > a “steps to reproduce” showing how I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion Could you provide some sample captures about the RTP issues cheers On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Erik de Jong <erikdej...@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Ale

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Could you provide some sample captures about the RTP issues cheers On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Erik de Jong wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Alexis La Goutte < > alexis.lagou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Jirka Novak

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Jirka Novak wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> I disagree. Right now, the GTK RTP player is the only one that I >> consider usable. By comparison, the Qt RTP

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Jirka Novak wrote: > Hi, > > >> I disagree. Right now, the GTK RTP player is the only one that I > consider usable. By comparison, the Qt RTP player only barely works, and > is unusable if you're dealing with more than one stream. If

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Hi Peter, >>> My proposal: >>> Add 'mixer' layer which will provide the following features to >>> improve usability: > > Your idea sounds good overall, but before you dive into it, can I > first suggest that a lot of the current problems are due to the use of > QCustomPlot for graphing the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Hi, >> I disagree. Right now, the GTK RTP player is the only one that I consider >> usable. By comparison, the Qt RTP player only barely works, and is unusable >> if you're dealing with more than one stream. If these changes can improve >> the Qt >version to be about as good as the GTK

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Hi Erik and Jirka, Some comments for both of you (makes sense to reply to both together). Firstly, Erik, did you see my comments about the RTP player from a few months ago? (https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201612/msg00081.html) I didn't submit any of it as bug reports, but I could

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark' <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion > > Hi Anders, > > > -Original Message- > > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org > [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org]

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

-Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Peter Budny Sent: den 27 mars 2017 16:48 To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark' <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a sugg

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Hi Anders, > -Original Message- > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Anders Broman > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 4:12 AM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Hello Erik, > My proposal: > Add 'mixer' layer which will provide the following features to improve > usability: I started work on "proof of concept" for very similar idea. I didn't finished it yet. But I have a few points which I would like to mention and discuss it there: 1) There are at

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

RTP playback "quirks" have caused me plenty of grief in the past. This sounds like a massive step forward in usability. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:39 PM Erik de Jong wrote: > Hello all, > > After looking at bugs 13511, 13512 and others it looks like a partial > rewrite

[Wireshark-dev] RTP player - a suggestion

Hello all, After looking at bugs 13511, 13512 and others it looks like a partial rewrite might be the way to go. Current situation: - Each RTP track added gets rendered to a pcm buffer for playback. - Each RTP track gets drawn on the graph. - When playing each track reports the played progress

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player redesign in 2.x makes it worse than the legacy one

On 2 January 2017 at 09:16, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > Hi Jirka, > > RTP Player is not often use by core team... (but used by a lot of > users)... > > Patches are welcome :) > > As someone who has never used the RTP player, I've often thought it's a bit of a stretch

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player redesign in 2.x makes it worse than the legacy one

Hi Jirka, RTP Player is not often use by core team... (but used by a lot of users)... Patches are welcome :) On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Jirka Novak wrote: > Hello Peter, > > > I admit that this is only my opinion, but as someone who uses the RTP > Player > > in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player redesign in 2.x makes it worse than the legacy one

Hello Peter, > I admit that this is only my opinion, but as someone who uses the RTP Player > in Wireshare very regularly in my job, I hope you'll give it some > consideration: > The UI of the redesigned RTP Player in Wireshark 2.x *sucks*, and its > usability is much worse than the old one

[Wireshark-dev] RTP player redesign in 2.x makes it worse than the legacy one

Hello, I admit that this is only my opinion, but as someone who uses the RTP Player in Wireshare very regularly in my job, I hope you'll give it some consideration: The UI of the redesigned RTP Player in Wireshark 2.x *sucks*, and its usability is much worse than the old one that's now in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player

Do we have a plan for the Qt equivalent of this UI? Yes. If nothing interested in port it, than I will do that. It is used for replay Bluetooth A2DP music. But I someone else want to do that please do generic player (component/class), because I have a plan to add player for next Bluetooth layer

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player

On 06/18/14 21:07, Evan Huus wrote: We have at least 30 bugs to do with RTP and the analysis/audio player: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=rtp Do we have a plan for the Qt equivalent of this UI? Is it worth doing, or should we hand it off to the OS's media player

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player

2014-06-20 7:38 GMT-07:00 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com: On 06/18/14 21:07, Evan Huus wrote: We have at least 30 bugs to do with RTP and the analysis/audio player: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=rtp Do we have a plan for the Qt equivalent of this UI? Is

[Wireshark-dev] RTP Player

We have at least 30 bugs to do with RTP and the analysis/audio player: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=rtp Do we have a plan for the Qt equivalent of this UI? Is it worth doing, or should we hand it off to the OS's media player (gstreamer or similar) or...? I would

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player

2014-06-18 18:07 GMT-07:00 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com: We have at least 30 bugs to do with RTP and the analysis/audio player: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=rtp Do we have a plan for the Qt equivalent of this UI? Is it worth doing, or should we hand it off to the

[Wireshark-dev] RTP Player under Linux

Do I need to enable special flags when ./configure to enable a RTP stream to be played back? I don't find the functionality as already seen in Windows version. Greets Alex ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player under Linux

Alexander Koeppe wrote: Do I need to enable special flags when ./configure to enable a RTP stream to be played back? I don't find the functionality as already seen in Windows version. --with-portaudio controls it. If it's not picking it up then you're probably missing the Portaudio

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player under Linux

Am 04.06.2012 19:32, schrieb Jeff Morriss: Alexander Koeppe wrote: Do I need to enable special flags when ./configure to enable a RTP stream to be played back? I don't find the functionality as already seen in Windows version. --with-portaudio controls it. If it's not picking it up then

[Wireshark-dev] RTP Player annoyance

Gentle developers, I believe the new RTP Player placement has been discussed in the mailing list in the past. I'm not sure anyone has noticed, but the ability to type in the selection list on the left hand side is quite a nice feature. However, I can no longer type 'r' t' 'p' and go

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player annoyance

Hi, The preference has already been moved into the statistics page, so it shouldn't conflict anymore. Thanx, Jaap Peter Fuller wrote: Gentle developers, I believe the new RTP Player placement has been discussed in the mailing list in the past. I'm not sure anyone has noticed, but

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Player annoyance

Hello Peter, This might be related to a known issue: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2325 Hope this helps! Abhik. On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Peter Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gentle developers, I believe the new RTP Player placement has been discussed in