On Wednesday 25 June 2014 12:56:21 Evan Huus wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Since Pascal's change ("TCP: do desegmentation sanity checks for all sub
> >> dissectors types"), the whois diss
Re-replying to -dev (oops)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since Pascal's change ("TCP: do desegmentation sanity checks for all sub
>> dissectors types"), the whois dissector was starting to throw:
>>
>> Disse
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since Pascal's change ("TCP: do desegmentation sanity checks for all sub
>> dissectors types"), the whois dissector was starting to throw:
>>
>> Dissector bug, protocol TCP, in p
On Wednesday 25 June 2014 18:32:44 Peter Wu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since Pascal's change ("TCP: do desegmentation sanity checks for all sub
> dissectors types"), the whois dissector was starting to throw:
>
> Dissector bug, protocol TCP, in packet 6: epan/dissectors/packet-tcp.c:3953:
> failed assert
Hi,
Since Pascal's change ("TCP: do desegmentation sanity checks for all sub
dissectors types"), the whois dissector was starting to throw:
Dissector bug, protocol TCP, in packet 6: epan/dissectors/packet-tcp.c:3953:
failed assertion "save_desegment_offset == pinfo->desegment_offset &&
save_de
