On 12/14/2013 5:30 AM, RobiOneKenobi wrote:
Yes,
if it didn't disturb too much people to have such long lines, I will prefer
that you revert this part (hf[] entries reformatting), otherwise I will
follow the majority wishses
I've restored the single line per hf[] entry format in SVN #54005.
On 12/18/2013 11:57 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 12/14/2013 5:30 AM, RobiOneKenobi wrote:
Yes,
if it didn't disturb too much people to have such long lines, I will
prefer
that you revert this part (hf[] entries reformatting), otherwise I will
follow the majority wishses
I've restored the single
Yes,
if it didn't disturb too much people to have such long lines, I will prefer
that you revert this part (hf[] entries reformatting), otherwise I will
follow the majority wishses
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org]
Reformat hf[] entries ?
Why, now all seems no more aligned for me, and your reformat also left
spaces between text and comma.
I do not agree with such reformat, as it seems less readable as the one I've
put in.
I like to have some parts aligned to an ease of use for to have the same
On 12/13/2013 12:21 PM, RobiOneKenobi wrote:
Reformat hf[] entries ?
Why, now all seems no more aligned for me, and your reformat also
left spaces between text and comma.
You're right; I was sloppy about leaving spaces between the text and the
comma. :)
I do not agree with such
