Re: [Wireshark-dev] Hierarchy of fields & offsets again, more potential offenders

> -Original Message- > From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf > Of Pascal Quantin > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:19 AM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Cc: Sake Blok > Subject: Re:

[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark / TShark Record Length: Stops Display

Guys, I am testing some test code for the new PDM IPv6 Destination Option (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option/) which is now in the RFC Editor's queue, so should get an RFC number soon! Anyway, what is happening is that we have a bug in the record length (I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark / TShark Record Length: Stops Display

On Aug 11, 2017, at 9:26 AM, Nalini J Elkins wrote: > I am testing some test code for the new PDM IPv6 Destination Option > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option/) which is > now in the RFC Editor's queue, so should get an RFC