You beat me by few seconds (not kidding)... There's an issue here: The h248v3 asn hasn't yet been tested...
I believe it would be better to revert the changes to the generated dissector and make them by hand. Then let the v3 asn for the next release. Anders, what do you think? On 10/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=19684 > > User: gerald > Date: 2006/10/25 05:00 PM > > Log: > Add more paranoid pointer checks. Fixes CID 219. > > Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ > Changes Path Action > +477 -1048 packet-h248.c Modified > +2 -2 packet-h248.h Modified > > Directory: /trunk/asn1/h248/ > Changes Path Action > +64 -64 packet-h248-template.c Modified > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-commits mailing list > Wireshark-commits@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
