Re: [Wireshark-users] STOP !!

2007-03-13 Thread Web and Co sprl - Patrick DERWAEL
Stephen, Many thanks for the info, I will try this version and give it a try !! _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher Sent: mardi 13 mars 2007 1:21 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] STOP !! This

Re: [Wireshark-users] Install / Uninstall

2007-03-13 Thread Hans Nilsson
If you're compiling from source checkinstall is a great tool to use, but maybe it's too late for that. But maybe you could re-install using checkinstall and then remove it. On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:08:12 -0400, Leonard, Thomas J [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: We are currently having a problem with our

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with insertedproprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Small, James
I am dealing with packets that are modified by a vendor device. The packets are standard Ethernet frames with IP. Once the frames/packets traverse the Vendor device, a new proprietary header is inserted between the Ethernet header and the IP header. So, in a standard IP/Ethernet

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with insertedproprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Guy Harris
Small, James wrote: Anyway, could be a useful Wireshark feature - if you agree let me know and I'll put it on the wish list. What would be nice would be a language to describe a packet format and an interpreter for the language, so that a non-programmer could add a dissector for simpler

Re: [Wireshark-users] Install / Uninstall

2007-03-13 Thread Hans Nilsson
Checkinstall is a separate program, that makes uninstalling programs compiled from source much easier. Take a look: http://asic-linux.com.mx/~izto/checkinstall/index.php Basically you do: ./configure make checkinstall And if you want to uninstall it you can use the normal packet manager. On

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Small, James
Anyway, could be a useful Wireshark feature - if you agree let me know and I'll put it on the wish list. What would be nice would be a language to describe a packet format and an interpreter for the language, so that a non-programmer could add a dissector for simpler protocols. Even if