Re: [Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged as untagged frames with an ip-filter

2007-05-02 Thread Guy Harris
Sake Blok wrote: While analysing a problem today I discovered that I had missed packets in my session after capturing with a filter like vlan and host x.x.x.x. After making a trace with no filter, I could see that packets in one direction were tagged, while they were not tagged in the other

Re: [Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged as untagged frames with an ip-filter

2007-05-02 Thread Guy Harris
Sake Blok wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:38:26PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: Sake Blok wrote: Might this be a WinPcap bug? Does it count as a bug if it's documented to work that way? :-) Most definitely not :-) I'm not saying that's necessarily the *right* behavior, or the *best* behavior

[Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged as untagged frames with an ip-filter

2007-05-01 Thread Sake Blok
Hi all, While analysing a problem today I discovered that I had missed packets in my session after capturing with a filter like vlan and host x.x.x.x. After making a trace with no filter, I could see that packets in one direction were tagged, while they were not tagged in the other direction.