Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-14 Thread Guy Harris
On Mar 13, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Small, James wrote: Guy, that sounds like an excellent idea. Would you like me to file the request? Yes, please do. (It is, of course, not a quick project.) ___ Wireshark-users mailing list

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-14 Thread Small, James
Hi Doug, That sounds pretty sweet. I tried to follow the steps and I think I'm close. I use bittwiste to change the Data Link Type: bittwiste -I one.cap -O two.cap -M 147 I load the libpcap file in Wireshark 0.99.5. Under the Info column I now see: WTAP_ENCAP = 45, so I think so far so good.

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-14 Thread Hans Nilsson
Maybe try ip instead of IP. On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:46:24 -0400, Small, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi Doug, That sounds pretty sweet. I tried to follow the steps and I think I'm close. I use bittwiste to change the Data Link Type: bittwiste -I one.cap -O two.cap -M 147 I load the

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-14 Thread Small, James
Yes--that's it! Thanks Hans. That definitely works and is easier than cutting the header out. Never the less, I really like Guy's idea as that would still let me see the Ethernet header too. Thanks for everyone's help on this, --Jim -Original Message- Maybe try ip instead of IP.

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Small, James
Anyway, could be a useful Wireshark feature - if you agree let me know and I'll put it on the wish list. What would be nice would be a language to describe a packet format and an interpreter for the language, so that a non-programmer could add a dissector for simpler protocols. Even if