Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question

2007-09-24 Thread Guy Harris
(When replying, please try to arrange things so that it's clear what text is quoted from the message and what text is your reply) On Sep 23, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Tom Maugham wrote: On Sep 23, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Sake Blok wrote: Sometimes it's even worse, the driver will not send any packets

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question

2007-09-23 Thread Tran Son
Hi. It is because Wireshark capture all packets which go to and out your interface while your wireless router select the packets and send them to relevant machines. That mean only the packet to or from your machine can be captured by wireshark unless your network using a hub for connection between

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question

2007-09-23 Thread Sake Blok
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 02:03:09PM -0400, Tom Maugham wrote: I have just installed Wireshark on a laptop which I want to use to monitor my home network. My setup is three desktops connected to a Westell 327W Verizon DSL wirless router. One desktop is hardwired and the other two and the laptop

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question

2007-09-23 Thread Tom Maugham
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 2:23 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 02:03:09PM -0400, Tom Maugham wrote: I have just installed Wireshark on a laptop which

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question

2007-09-23 Thread Sake Blok
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 2:23 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 02:03:09PM -0400, Tom Maugham wrote: I have

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question

2007-09-23 Thread Tom Maugham
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 6:19 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 05:38:57PM -0400, Tom Maugham wrote

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question about capture point

2007-06-29 Thread Randy . Grein
Wireshark uses the NDIS stack through a Winpcap shim; NDIS is one of the Windows protocol analyzer problems. NDIS never did fully specify a promiscuous mode, so it's left up to the vendor who writes the driver. Card vendors supply some promiscuous functionality, but AFAIK none pass on all

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question about capture point

2007-06-29 Thread Gianluca Varenni
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question about capture point Wireshark uses the NDIS stack through a Winpcap shim; NDIS is one of the Windows protocol analyzer problems. NDIS never did fully specify a promiscuous mode, so it's left up to the vendor who writes the driver. Card vendors

Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question about capture point

2007-06-29 Thread Randy . Grein
@wireshark.org cc Subject Re: [Wireshark-users] Newbie question about capture point I might be wrong, but I don't think many OSes and network cards do provide corrupted packets (wrong FCS or link layer errors) even when put into promiscuous mode. This is because usually the MAC chip on the cards

Re: [Wireshark-users] newbie question

2006-08-16 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:34:15AM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: Stephen Fisher wrote: You can specify a capture filter to tshark (or wireshark while it's I assume you meant You can specify a display filter to tshark ..., as that's a display filter (and as the person who asked the question