Re: [Wireshark-users] Query regarding GSM MAP traces analysis

2008-02-08 Thread jehanzeb . khan
Dear All The issue has been resolved after defining the SSN numbers. Alain and Anders, thanks a lot for your help. Regards Jehanzeb - Original Message From: AMEAUME ALAIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Community support list for Wireshark wireshark-users@wireshark.org Sent: Friday, February

Re: [Wireshark-users] Build problems with Sun's compiler on Solaris 10

2008-02-08 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Guy Harris wrote: Dr. David Kirkby wrote: OK, I'm attaching the part of config.log from the 0.99.7.tar.gz file - there are no patches I've applied, nothing from trunk - just the latest 'stable' distribution. I can attack the full config.log if you want, but it is over 200 KB, so

[Wireshark-users] Compilation problems with CVS libpcap

2008-02-08 Thread Stephen O'Connell
Hi, I would like to use Wireshark to monitor USB transfers - to do this I believe I need to use a CVS version of libpcap because the USB code hasn't made it in to a package yet. I've successfully compiled libpcap from CVS, but can't get Wireshark (0.99.7) to compile against it. Whenever I run

Re: [Wireshark-users] http Content-Encoding: gzip not decoding

2008-02-08 Thread Sake Blok
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:41:16AM -0800, Bob Keyes wrote: I've been trying to figure out some weirdness with the Amtrak reservations web site, and have applied Wireshark to the task. Packets are sniffed, tcp streams assembled, but when it comes time to decode gzip encoded content, I get

Re: [Wireshark-users] Compilation problems with CVS libpcap

2008-02-08 Thread Guy Harris
Stephen O'Connell wrote: /usr/local/lib/libpcap.a(gencode.o): In function `.L186': gencode.c:(.text+0x869): undefined reference to `pcap_parse' In the source tree of the version of libpcap you built, what does the command egrep pcap_parse *.[chyl] print?

Re: [Wireshark-users] Which hardware

2008-02-08 Thread ronnie sahlberg
Use a linux box to run wireshark on instead. It is cheaper than terminal servers and as a bonuson the same hardware, processing the same capture files, wireshark will run several times faster on linux than w2k3 On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Taco Amory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,

Re: [Wireshark-users] Which hardware

2008-02-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
ronnie sahlberg schrieb: Use a linux box to run wireshark on instead. It is cheaper than terminal servers and as a bonuson the same hardware, processing the same capture files, wireshark will run several times faster on linux than w2k3 Do you have any hard facts, or is this the usual

[Wireshark-users] Which hardware

2008-02-08 Thread Taco Amory
Hi, Maybe somebody could help me? In our company we want to sniff on an Ethernet line to Internet. Currently we have an average throughput of 35 Mbit/s. We have already placed a line tap inline on the connection towards internet. The wish is that more then one user can use wireshark

[Wireshark-users] http Content-Encoding: gzip not decoding

2008-02-08 Thread Bob Keyes
Hello, I've been trying to figure out some weirdness with the Amtrak reservations web site, and have applied Wireshark to the task. Packets are sniffed, tcp streams assembled, but when it comes time to decode gzip encoded content, I get nowhere. I am running 0.99.6 on Ubuntu Gutsy. I have seen

Re: [Wireshark-users] Which hardware

2008-02-08 Thread ronnie sahlberg
Personal first hand experience. I have tested this myself on several PCs and compared. The same host, the same capture file, the same preferences using the same SVN version of wireshark it ran 2+ times faster when booting into linux than w2k and w2k3. Bear in mind, the tests were all for semi

Re: [Wireshark-users] Which hardware

2008-02-08 Thread ronnie sahlberg
the OSX tests was on similarly specced hardware. I could obviously not test how OSX Wireshark behaved/performed on the same physical machine I tested with Windows. On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 11:25 AM, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personal first hand experience. I have tested this

Re: [Wireshark-users] Which hardware

2008-02-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
ronnie sahlberg schrieb: Personal first hand experience. SCNR to ask your motivations ;-) I have tested this myself on several PCs and compared. The same host, the same capture file, the same preferences using the same SVN version of wireshark it ran 2+ times faster when booting into