Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP

2008-01-12 Thread Ariel Burbaickij
PPID==7 does not work in the sense that iti is not decoded , however filtering on sctp data payload ==7 delivers exactly the packets one would expect and where one would expect them , so rather weird. /wbr Ariel Burbaickij On Jan 12, 2008 11:41 PM, Anders Broman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, >

[Wireshark-users] MacOS X Leopard package of Wireshark 0.99.7 available

2008-01-12 Thread Andreas Fink
Please note that a new wireshark package installer has been made available on http://www.finkconsulting.com/page7.php http://www.finkconsulting.com/opensource/WiresharkLeopard/Wireshark-Leopard.dmg (direct download) The package contains Wireshark 0.99.7 (from www.wireshark.org) built fro

Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP

2008-01-12 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, It does on my traces but if H248 is not detected in yours the filter won't work. At a glance at the code SCTP port does not work for H.248(not implermented(yet)) ppid *should* work. Regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Ariel Bur

Re: [Wireshark-users] Capturing traffic resulting from running a new program

2008-01-12 Thread Frank Bulk - iNAME
I would recommend that you use utility such as TCPView (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897437.aspx) to see what a specific application is doing. It would be neat to see Wireshark extended to be able to capture traffic on a process and all sub-processes that are spawned - I wo

[Wireshark-users] Capturing traffic resulting from running a new program

2008-01-12 Thread Richard Sargent
Most Windows machines seem to be very busy in terms of the amount of network traffic. Is it possible to set up a filter that basically says "ignore everything that is current showing up"? It would make it so much easier to see what a new program is sending and receiving if you could focus on just i

Re: [Wireshark-users] LLC Sub-Layer Management

2008-01-12 Thread Hansang Bae
E B wrote: > You mean to tell me that nobody has ever seen a packet with this summary > line before?! : > "I P, N(R)=1, N(S)=85; DSAP LLC Sub-Layer Management Individual, SSAP SNAP > Command" > and it gets this response > "U F, func=RD; DSAP LLC Sub-Layer Management Group, SSAP 0x52 Response" L

Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP

2008-01-12 Thread Ariel Burbaickij
Hello Anders, glad to see your again, I will provide detailed answers on Monday, 14.01.2007 as I am away from equipment. However, if I understand the nature of your questions correctly -- they imply that there are some limitations. Is it correct? How about the fact that filter h248 does not work i

Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP

2008-01-12 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Traces I have of H.248 over SCTP decodes... Is PPID 7 used? Is it Binary or text? Can you send a small sample trace? Regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Ariel Burbaickij Skickat: den 12 januari 2008 11:02 Till: wireshark-users@

[Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP

2008-01-12 Thread Ariel Burbaickij
Hello all, we use h.248 over SCTP and wireshark behaves in such a way that I at least need your advise as of now I still hesistate to submit bug report. We observe following: 1) It is not possible to filter on h248 or MEGACO filters user needs to enter sctp protocol payload number in order to g