Re: [Wireshark-users] SCCP XUDT (Segmentation)

2008-01-11 Thread Andreas Fink
>> >> "Message Transport Failure" implies a message ordering problem or >> timeout. Looking at your MTP routing label the 2 messages are on >> different SLS despite the fact that Class-1 is selected. That >> might be >> the problem. (I didn't check a lot for other possible problems.) > > > Ah.

Re: [Wireshark-users] SCCP XUDT (Segmentation)

2008-01-11 Thread Andreas Fink
On 11.01.2008, at 17:21, Jeff Morriss wrote: Andreas Fink wrote: Does anyone here have a proper sample of a trace of a SCCP XUDT message including segments? My self made packet decodes correctly in wireshark but the global title node doesn't like it and rejects it with 0x08 (Message Transp

Re: [Wireshark-users] SCCP XUDT (Segmentation)

2008-01-11 Thread Jeff Morriss
Andreas Fink wrote: > Does anyone here have a proper sample of a trace of a SCCP XUDT message > including segments? > > My self made packet decodes correctly in wireshark but the global title > node doesn't like it and rejects it with 0x08 (Message Transport > Failure) and I don't have anythi

Re: [Wireshark-users] SCCP XUDT (Segmentation)

2008-01-11 Thread AMEAUME ALAIN
> Does anyone here have a proper sample of a trace of a SCCP XUDT message including segments? > My self made packet decodes correctly in wireshark but the global title node doesn't like it and rejects it with 0x08 (Message Transport Failure) and I don't have anything to compare against what cou

[Wireshark-users] SCCP XUDT (Segmentation)

2008-01-11 Thread Andreas Fink
Does anyone here have a proper sample of a trace of a SCCP XUDT message including segments?My self made packet decodes correctly in wireshark but the global title node doesn't like it and rejects it with 0x08 (Message Transport Failure) and I don't have anything to compare against what could be wro