Hi Andy,
Lots of interesting suggestions - one that I have used which works
decently is the bittwist family (works on most platforms including
Windows with pre-built binaries available). Just make sure you heed
Guy's warning - there are many other embedded fields and it's hard to
get them all in
t: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:29 PM
To: wireshark-users@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Whitewashing Packet Traces?
Hey all:
I'm doing some troubleshooting in a client environ,
and we're using Wireshark to analyze CIFS traffic.
Problem is, they're a secure site, and require a
J. Andrew Kitkowski wrote:
> Hey all:
>
> I'm doing some troubleshooting in a client environ,
> and we're using Wireshark to analyze CIFS traffic.
>
> Problem is, they're a secure site, and require a
> whitewash/screening process on all data before they
> can send to us.
>
> In this case, the trace
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Andrew
Kitkowski
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:29 PM
To: wireshark-users@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Whitewashing Packet Traces?
Hey all:
I'm doing some troubleshooting in a client environ,
and we're using Wireshark to analyze CIFS traffic.
P
J. Andrew Kitkowski wrote:
> In this case, the trace was taken between a W2K3
> server and a Netapp filer (just between two
> interfaces/IPs), and we're looking for a way we can
> basically whitewash the trace. That is, basically
> replace the IPs within the trace with other IPs
> (change "10.100
Hey all:
I'm doing some troubleshooting in a client environ,
and we're using Wireshark to analyze CIFS traffic.
Problem is, they're a secure site, and require a
whitewash/screening process on all data before they
can send to us.
In this case, the trace was taken between a W2K3
server and a Netap
