[Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
Hi, I have a wireshark pc with a 10/100 nic connected to a switch. The port attached to the pc is getting data mirrored from a 1Gig port passing traffic. So, in other words, the w/s pc is sniffing a port that could run as fast as 1gig (see below). 1g 1g

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
Cool idea! I'm googling as we speak. ;-) Thanks for the great input. -T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:05 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
monitor and monitored ports are the same speed, but this configuration just won't work. Given the price of gigabit adapters and ports it makes sense to upgrade your Wireshark PC. Randy Grein Network Engineer Tennis Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/13/2007 01:39 PM Please

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:48:00PM -0700, Tennis Smith wrote: Cool idea! I'm googling as we speak. ;-) Oh, if you look for a Windows program doing the same, google for PRTG :) [TNS] Good idea. Will have a look. Cheers, Sake ___ Wireshark-users

[Wireshark-users] tshark loopback

2008-03-20 Thread Tennis Smith
Hi, I run a series of tests via a loopback interface on Fedora 7. Is there any way to start tshark and have it monitor activity on the loopback, even if traffic is not yet being passed? Thanks, -T ___ Wireshark-users mailing list

Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark loopback

2008-03-20 Thread Tennis Smith
That did it. :) Thanks. -T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 12:02 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark loopback Tennis Smith wrote: tshark -i lo0