That makes sense. Thanks for the info!
-Original Message-
From: Customer Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Question about argument names
There is no speed improvement by using _function
crawl to a stop with hundreds of the args
being passed.
That makes sense. Thanks for the info!
-Original Message-
From: Customer Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Question about argument names
Hi Jamileh,
I'm not sure about the _function argument, but I have a vague memory of an
engineer confiding in me at a Conference once that if you include the
following argument in a TAF file request - the Server automatically goes
into Secret-double-hyper-overdrive and will run 200% faster.
Message-
From: Scott Cadillac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Question about argument names
Hi Jamileh,
I'm not sure about the _function argument, but I have a
vague memory of an engineer confiding in me
There is no speed improvement by using _function but if you look at the
code that builds the next previous buttons in the search builder you
will see where the _ before an argument is used and why Everyware built
it this way.
This routine removes the args that start with an _ as it is
