Not really, I'm afraid, although I do appreciate the effort. My problem is that
I've got multiple dependencies that I need to
make sure are installed, and I'm pretty much stuck doing it the "dumb" way by
kicking the installers off as custom actions
during the InstallUISequence. I know that's th
John:
I was using a custom action to do that until today. I'm now linking the runtime
straight into my executable instead of leaving
it hanging as a dependency on a DLL.
--
Eric Fesh
Customer Support Engineer/Software Test Engineer
Verari Systems Software, Inc.
110 12th Street North, Suite D10
You'll have to forgive Rob for being a man of few words - he's a newlywed
and probably out of breath ;) (Congratulations!). Here's how I passed
multiple properties but I can't take credit for this - I found the example
somewhere else:
NOT
Installed
In the above example,
I believe you're back in the non-elevated part of the installation
because by default you can't be elevated unless you run as a deferred
CA, and you can't be deferred outside the InstallInitialize/Finalize
actions. It's an immediate CA, right?
Phil Wilson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAI
I abandoned that approach...
Instead this seems to work ok so far...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Directory-Search-tf2670191.html#a7472993
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is the error message from a dialog that pops up, or the log? Sometimes,
odd installer errors are really something else that's not 100% related
to the error that gets spit out. Or it might result from an earlier
warning that's not displayed. You might produce a log from the
commandline to get more d
Soon DigiCert will be providing a new weapon to assist in preventing these
thieves from stealing your passwords and credit card information. Er zijn toch
een aantal ontwikkelingen geweest die het vermelden waard zijn. I know that
when I looked into working in Spain, I was in for a shock. Well,
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember that Win2003 only comes with .NET
Framework 1.1 and not the service packs. Have you tried installing SP1?
Justin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cullen Waters
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:50 AM
To: 'Wix Group'
Subje
I'm writing a c++ custom action to uninstall a badly installed piece of
software before installing. Unfortunately, I can't remove a particular
DLL because it's opened by wuauclt.exe.
It's possible that this wouldn't occur within the installer, but only
when I'm running the CA outside.
Could an
Try your installer with release 3309.
David Adams
MSN MessengerID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I am new to WIX and am trying to install basic website but am running into
issues. When I try installing the website I get the following error:
Failed to read IIsWebs table. (-2147024774 )
Hi All,
I am new to WIX and am trying to install basic website but am running into
issues. When I try installing the website I get the following error:
Failed to read IIsWebs table. (-2147024774 )
Here is the code and settings I currently have:
1. Snippet of code from Wix:
...
If it makes any difference, this is a .Net application. Furthermore, I seem
to remember the same issue existed in our InstallShield-based installer as
well.
On 11/21/06, Rob Mensching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm at a loss then. The log file message you note below is what I would
expect to
Funny - you'd think that Microsoft would be using these same merge modules for
their own applications that want to install the MSVC runtime libraries in the
side-by-side. In that case, wouldn't they have worked out all the bugs long
ago? I guess I'm being a bit sardonic here - it's clear to me t
You shouldn't need a custom action. If a file was in use then the Windows
Installer should prompt for install. How are you uninstalling the product? Is
it possible that you are suppressing the dialog that would tell you a reboot is
required?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just display a dialog that is conditionalized on the correct property. You can
exit the install or allow it to continue based on user decisions.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Lalande
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 15:13
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
According to the MS article in the error message, Win2k3 comes with .NET1.1
SP1. The build number of .NET 1.1 on my machine is 1.1.4322.2300, which is the
highest 1.1 build number I've seen.
I ran Microsoft Update, just to make sure, and it didn't list SP1 as an
available update.
I've now got
What version of the WiX toolset are you using?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zane Teh
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 15:01
To: 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Cc: Suresh Parameshwar
Subject: [WiX-users] New Website install
Hi All,
I am new to WIX and am tryin
In the log file, I see:
MSI (s) (28:F8) [01:13:38:389]: Scheduling file
'C:\WINDOWS\Installer\280e0aa.msi' for deletion during post-install cleanup
(not post-reboot).
and
MSI (s) (28:F8) [01:13:38:405]: Scheduling file
'C:\WINDOWS\Installer\{3E568507-73F2-4843-ADCC-885C8DD10D67}\DA.exe' for
delet
We are using v2.0.4117.0
From: Rob Mensching
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 3:24 PM
To: Zane Teh; 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Cc: Suresh Parameshwar
Subject: RE: [WiX-users] New Website install
What version of the WiX toolset are you using?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Our application is not currently officially supported on Windows 2003 (some
mumbo-jumbo about QA having to give the thumbs up). But I know it works
because Windows 2003 is what my development PC runs.
Is there a WiX way to display a warning to the user that Windows 2003 is not
a supported platfor
20 matches
Mail list logo
