On 30-May-12 11:14, Hoover, Jacob wrote:
> That is the question, though I suspect that it would still need to in order
> to update the bundle's installation information.
I don't think the patch bundle touches the per-machine bundle's
registration. But it would be registered per-user, so it's more
users] Burn and LUA Patching
On 29-May-12 14:19, Rob Mensching wrote:
> The Burn engine will need to elevate to apply per-machine patches.
Would it have to? If MspPackage/@PerMachine="no", would a LUA-compliant
per-machine patch Just Work(tm)?
--
sig://boB
htt
On 29-May-12 14:19, Rob Mensching wrote:
> The Burn engine will need to elevate to apply per-machine patches.
Would it have to? If MspPackage/@PerMachine="no", would a LUA-compliant
per-machine patch Just Work(tm)?
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
---
The Burn engine will need to elevate to apply per-machine patches. We don't
have a system service on the machine to avoid the elevation prompt like the
Windows Installer does.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Hoover, Jacob
wrote:
> I have not tried the patch only scenario as of yet, but I was won
I have not tried the patch only scenario as of yet, but I was wondering if
anyone else has. Specifically I am looking to see if Burn has been designed in
such a way where if all you are applying is a patch(s) to an already installed
bundle will it allow for LUA patching? I've got both the MSI an
5 matches
Mail list logo