Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-05 Thread Brian Rogers
et so they didn't really pay attention to > the technical "correctness" of the final product. It works very well within > VS .Net (ummm... errr... I mean "very well" relative to all other Crystal > products :) > > Thanks again! > > > Date: Mon, 4

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Anthony F
ll other Crystal products :) Thanks again! > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:58:23 -0400 > From: b...@joyofsetup.com > To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work > > Anthony F wrote: > > I'll be

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Brian Rogers
-time components to get their app working again. I quoted 4 hours to get > this done... I've already used that up :) > > > > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:11:23 -0700 > > From: wende...@gmail.com > > To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [WiX-users

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Bob Arnson
Anthony F wrote: > I'll be the first to admit that I'm by no means an expert in the art of > creating install packages, but if VS can handle the messed up msm, shouldn't > wix be able to as well? I thought (I may be WAY wrong on this) that the VS > packager was based on wix? > It is not bas

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Anthony F
module so they can re-install the Crystal run-time components to get their app working again. I quoted 4 hours to get this done... I've already used that up :) > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:11:23 -0700 > From: wende...@gmail.com > To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [WiX-

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Wendell Joost
> e the behavior you want. > ... (lots of these) > > C:\Users\Anthony\AppData\Local\Temp\2yuyq_e9\CR2005.msi : error LGHT0204 : > ICE83: Both MsiPublishAssemblies AND MsiUnpublishAssemblies actions MUST be > present in InstallExecuteSequence table. > C:\Users\Anthony\AppData\Loca

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Brian Rogers
shAssemblies actions MUST be > present in InstallExecuteSequence table. > C:\Users\Anthony\AppData\Local\Temp\2yuyq_e9\CR2005.msi : error LGHT0204 : > ICE83: The MsiPublishAssemblies action MUST be present in > AdvtExecuteSequence table. > > > > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:52:18 -0

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Anthony F
lies action MUST be present in AdvtExecuteSequence table. > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:52:18 -0700 > From: wende...@gmail.com > To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work > > What are the errors? > Can you email

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Brian Rogers
Hey Anthony, Have you looked at the help documentation? There is a sample on how to do that in there. Brian Rogers "Intelligence removes complexity." - Me http://icumove.spaces.live.com On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Anthony F wrote: > > I've been banging my head for the last few hours trying

Re: [WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Wendell Joost
What are the errors? Can you email your wxs file and .cmd file for building and I'll take a look? Thanks! Wendell On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Anthony F wrote: > > I've been banging my head for the last few hours trying to create a > super-simple installer (my first) with wix.  All I want

[WiX-users] Frustrated... can't get a simple installer to work

2009-05-04 Thread Anthony F
I've been banging my head for the last few hours trying to create a super-simple installer (my first) with wix. All I want is an installer that includes a single merge module... and that's it. No options, no gui, no additional files. Just the merge module. I figured it would be a pretty si