On 17-Jan-12 17:16, Peter Hull wrote:
I'd still like to hear if anyone has any comments on a per-user
install which includes a device driver - is it always better to do it
per-machine.
Drivers are per-machine resources so a per-user installer that includes
one can't offer the benefits of
: Peter Hull [mailto:peterhul...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 22:17
To: WiX Users
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] difx extension and perMachine installs
If the driver is not signed, and you say it is not, then you need the
Legacy option. I did say that; what I meant was not signed
[mailto:peterhul...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 22:21
To: WiX Users
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] difx extension and perMachine installs
Thanks James, good point.
The driver will be signed for production; it just isn't at the moment. I
shouldn't need the Legacy option.
I've been mulling over
If the driver is not signed, and you say it is not, then you need the Legacy
option. I did say that; what I meant was not signed with a certificate from
a CA. It is self-signed at the moment. Apologies for the confusion.
I'd still like to hear if anyone has any comments on a per-user install
I am building an installer with a device driver, to be installed with the WiX
difx extension. The driver is self-signed for testing purposes. I set my
Package element to
Package Description=...
InstallerVersion=200
InstallScope=perUser
with missing files
Also see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff547653(VS.85).aspx for
more info on what legacy mode is.
James
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hull [mailto:peterhul...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 14:59
To: WiX Users
Subject: [WiX-users] difx extension
won't fail in the field, and you guys are the experts!
ThanksPete
From: johnst...@inn-soft.com
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:29:41 +
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] difx extension and perMachine installs
Did you remember
7 matches
Mail list logo
