Hi,
* Jonathan 'Sky' Squirawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-16 22:23]:
I would enjoy to patch sswriter with your feature but actualy I'm rewriting it
with a totaly new design.
That's OK with me.
I just wanted to be helpful, if someone does have same preferences like me.
My code is not that
Le Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:22:47 +0200,
Stanimir Dragiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi,
* Jonathan 'Sky' Squirawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-16 22:23]:
I would enjoy to patch sswriter with your feature but actualy I'm rewriting
it with a totaly new design.
That's OK with me.
I just
Hello,
I would enjoy to patch sswriter with your feature but actualy I'm rewriting it
with a totaly new design. In my new version, sswriter is composed of a daemon
and several tools to start/get some monitoring elements and can be used by
the network. The final purpose is to have tools wich can
Le Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:05:31 -0800 (PST),
Aaron Grattafiori [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Le Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:01:38 -0500,
Kris Maglione [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Sky wrote:
I've wrote a little application in C for the status bar. It's
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Sky wrote:
I've wrote a little application in C for the status bar. It's mostly for my
needs but it can be interest some of you. Additionally it's really faster than
a bash script.
Hi,
We don't use the b word around here. Anyway, in what way is it
Le Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:01:38 -0500,
Kris Maglione [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Sky wrote:
I've wrote a little application in C for the status bar. It's mostly
for my
needs but it can be interest some of you. Additionally it's really
faster
than a
