Also running firefox latest here.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Paleo Pat tpblogedi...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an oddball one... If it do the full screen deal in press this it
quotes. When it's in normal mode, it won't.
Very strange.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Paleo Pat
hi all,
I wonder if Im the only one here that gets annoyed with the amount of
absolute URLs and paths that are hardcoded in the wordpress database.
Is there anybody out there who is also unhappy with this and is there any
effort to get rid of this? Id love to help on this refactor...
cheers
Isn't it due to this effort?
http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/wordpress-23-canonical-urls/
-x.
2009/3/18 Leo germani leogerm...@gmail.com
hi all,
I wonder if Im the only one here that gets annoyed with the amount of
absolute URLs and paths that are hardcoded in the wordpress
hmm. actually no.
Im referring to the site_ur and home options on the options table, as well
as all the guid fields for all the attachments, the links to all the images
inside all the posts, and other options that also store hard-coded full
URLs...
this is specially bad when moving the site from
I believe the hardcoded attachments are just incase your post gets harvested
by one of those bot things so that attachment links still link back to your
site correctly. As for any other reasons I'm stumped I agree it's a pain
in the backside moving from test to production. I always used a find
Wasn't this covered in a Jan 2009 thread I started on using shortcodes
for images? And shot down in flames.
http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2009-January/024098.html
P-
On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Paul Robinson wrote:
I believe the hardcoded attachments are just incase your
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Paul p...@codehooligans.com wrote:
Wasn't this covered in a Jan 2009 thread I started on using shortcodes for
images? And shot down in flames.
http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2009-January/024098.html
There was also a similar discussion in
I suppose the answer to all this is to make some sort of downloadable tool,
not so much a plugin, that will go through the database in stages change
all of the domains to what your specify. Don't ask me as it's way over my
head, but I think that might be the best idea rather than some sort of
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:23:45 +0100, Paul Robinson
pablorobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the hardcoded attachments are just incase your post gets
harvested
by one of those bot things so that attachment links still link back to
your
site correctly. As for any other reasons I'm stumped I
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:17:58 +0100, Leo germani leogerm...@gmail.com
wrote:
this is specially bad when moving the site from a test server to
production,
for instance...
yes it is. this is a known limitation with wordpress.
-- Tom
___
wp-testers
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:49:58 +0100, Xavier Borderie xav...@borderie.net
wrote:
Isn't it due to this effort?
http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/wordpress-23-canonical-urls/
-x.
I strongly doubt this. I think it is because of a misconception for
handling links / domains in
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:23:49 +0100, Leo germani leogerm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anybody out there who is also unhappy with
Yes, many, many, (many, many) users are unhappy about it.
this and is there any
effort to get rid of this? Id love to help on this refactor...
Ask the core
Count me as one who is unhappy with it. Why not default to using *relative*
urls? That way, it doesn't matter what the domain is? Is there something
inherently evil about relative urls? Anytime I do development, that's what I
use so that transferring to domains is a cinch.
Is there anybody
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Toby Simmons
t...@simmonsconsulting.com wrote:
Count me as one who is unhappy with it. Why not default to using *relative*
urls? That way, it doesn't matter what the domain is? Is there something
inherently evil about relative urls? Anytime I do development,
Hi All,
Things are done for a reason, but we have a problem at the moment, one that
I also think should be simplified is when going from dev - test - live
cycle.
I believe because of WYSIWYG Editor need to display the images it needs to
have the absolute URL. one suggestion that I can think of
15 matches
Mail list logo
