[wpkg-users] several hosts (by mask) with several profiles

2011-02-04 Thread Alexey
To warn against attempts to send me to read about regular expressions and article "Several profiles for one host" ( http://wpkg.org/Hosts.xml ) I note the following points: The system selects the first matching profile and stops processing other profiles. For example, the computer MOW-SAL-01 exe

[wpkg-users] several hosts (by mask) with several profiles

2011-02-03 Thread Alexey
branches and about 5 functionalities. 17x5= 85 Profiles?! Oh, no... Please, Help to find decision! With regards, Alexey - wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg

Re: [wpkg-users] Windows XP SP3

2010-10-27 Thread Alexey
hat wpkg is working (http://wpkg.org/Screenshots). > > It doesn't really work as a progress bar but it is a visual reminder for > them not to restart the machine. > > Is this not working for you? > > > On 27 October 2010 19:44, Alexey wrote: > >> :)) >> Oh! I

[wpkg-users] Fwd: Windows XP SP3

2010-10-27 Thread Alexey
:)) Oh! I lost some text here. Due to the fact that the install SP3 on some computers is more than 1,5 hours to the user to display "Please wait for the screen". I want show "WaitScreen" only on some PC, where SP3 will be installed. How can I solve this task? 2010/10/27

[wpkg-users] Windows XP SP3

2010-10-27 Thread Alexey
Hi, All! After news about the support ended of XP SP2 ( http://support.microsoft.com/gp/windowsxpsp2) we decide install SP3 all over around. There is ( http://wpkg.org/Windows_XP_SP3 ) ready package for SP3 install. How can I solve this task? with regards, Alexey

[wpkg-users] WpkgService must be stopped or running after it successfully finished?

2010-10-20 Thread Alexey
Why WpkgService is in the STARTED state although judging by logs it successfully finished. Maybe this is controlled by some kind of setting? - wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/

[wpkg-users] Should the WPKG service stop after launch?

2010-10-07 Thread Alexey
What is the last message must be in the logs from WPKG Service? Why is WPKG service after the boot (and my logon) will remain in the Start Status? Last message in my Log files is 2010-10-08 08:47:45, DEBUG : Going to install package 'wpkg.xml files from workstations' (wpkglog), Revision 1, (ex

[wpkg-users] What's the basic logic WPKG for such situations: Upgrade if app in profile is upper installed manually app.

2010-09-24 Thread Alexey
I have got profile 7-zip on version 4.65: a user computer was installed 7-zip 4.57, mannualy, without WPKG. After work WPKG In reality WPKG execute 7zip install. Package '7-Zip' (7zip): Not installed (checks failed). Preparing installation. Installing

[wpkg-users] How install package on user logon by admin rights?

2010-09-22 Thread Alexey
I need install some packages by admin rights after first user logon on this computer.. What is the matter? All WPKG scripts executed on machine before user authorisation. Can I install some WPKG packages with admin rights after user logon? NOTE: I use WPKG service to control PC inside and outside w

Re: [wpkg-users] How to make WPKG Client(service) run in silent mode?

2010-09-21 Thread Alexey
:) No, I have it was set by default value = 10. Where was written that if the logon delay is more than zero, then spit on the NO, spit on the YES? GUI must live forever? Thank you, Tomasz! Now all right. 0 2010/9/22 Tomasz Chmielewski > On 21.09.2010 23:17, Alexey wrote: > >>

Re: [wpkg-users] How to make WPKG Client(service) run in silent mode?

2010-09-21 Thread Alexey
On 21.09.2010 20:27, Alexey wrote: > >> How I can hide graphical interface, when working WPKG? I`ve tried >> everything than can be: different choices different options... >> And now I got the idea: maybe it is not possible in principle?? >> > > What kind of GUI d

[wpkg-users] How to make WPKG Client(service) run in silent mode?

2010-09-21 Thread Alexey
How I can hide graphical interface, when working WPKG? I`ve tried everything than can be: different choices different options... And now I got the idea: maybe it is not possible in principle?? My Settings.XML: /synchronize /nonotify YES NO My config.xml: All packages has option