Re: [wpkg-users] [Bug 278] Wrong host match

2012-12-15 Thread Stefan Pendl
Am 14.12.2012 18:54, schrieb Helmut Hullen: how about the following match: ^\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*$ So if the match pattern of the name attribute matches that pattern, then it is an IP, else it is a host name match. Aehemmm ... what about 345.456.567.678 The pattern

Re: [wpkg-users] [Bug 278] Wrong host match

2012-12-15 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Stefan, Du meintest am 15.12.12: how about the following match: ^\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*$ So if the match pattern of the name attribute matches that pattern, then it is an IP, else it is a host name match. Aehemmm ... what about 345.456.567.678 The pattern

[wpkg-users] [Bug 278] Wrong host match

2012-12-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Pendl pendl2mega...@yahoo.de --- Rainer, how about the following match: ^\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*$ So if the match pattern of the name attribute matches that pattern, then it is an IP, else it is a host name match. --

Re: [wpkg-users] [Bug 278] Wrong host match

2012-12-14 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, bugzilla-daemon, Du meintest am 14.12.12: how about the following match: ^\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*\.\d\d*$ So if the match pattern of the name attribute matches that pattern, then it is an IP, else it is a host name match. Aehemmm ... what about 345.456.567.678 Viele Gruesse!

[wpkg-users] [Bug 278] Wrong host match

2012-12-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Pendl pendl2mega...@yahoo.de --- Hi Rainer, yes, I have replaced the old name attribute with the new hostname attribute, so it is all good now. How about adding a deprecated message to the log file, if the old name