RE: [WSG] Doctype Javascript and accessibility

2004-08-10 Thread Nancy Johnson
Thanks to Patrick and yourself for responding. I am beginning the process of migrating an existing web site from FrontPage to Contribute. I have always used the webbot feature for includes of footers and navigation. This is a website that has unfortunately multiple generations of html, and

[WSG] automated response

2004-08-10 Thread f.vanknijff
Geachte heer/mevrouw, Ik ben van 10 tot 20 augustus op vakantie. U kunt contact opnemen met mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Met vriendelijke groet, Fabian van Knijff ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web

RE: [WSG] Doctype Javascript and accessibility

2004-08-10 Thread Sandie Socia
Nancy, Just a thought but I've experienced something similar (I think). I had files with includes using .shtml that worked with my index.html file. I changed servers and the new server was completely opposite. I had to change all my main pages to .shtml (index.shtml, etc) and my actual includd

Re: [WSG] Doctype Javascript and accessibility

2004-08-10 Thread Nick Gleitzman
On Tuesday, Aug 10, 2004, at 22:46 Australia/Sydney, Nancy Johnson wrote: I am having trouble with server side includes working with documents ending in .htm or .html. They only seem to work with .asp documents. Change the file suffixes to .shtm or .shtml and your includes should work OK.

[WSG] Developer feedback requested for IE7

2004-08-10 Thread Geoff Deering
MS is looking for feedback from developers on IE7. http://channel9.msdn.com/wiki/default.aspx/Channel9.InternetExplorerFeedback http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3392061 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2004JulSep/0013.html

[WSG] forms and SSL

2004-08-10 Thread Chris Blown
A discussion popped up here recently, and though its not really specific to web standards, I still think its worthy of a bit of discussion on the list. If you have a form that is served via standard http with its action set to a https server, then one assumes that the UA will send an encrypted

Re: [WSG] guide to CSS inheritance

2004-08-10 Thread John Horner
Seeing this email reminded me of something. Yes, some CSS properties are inherited and some aren't. Inheritance depends on *specificity*, which can be reduced to a mathematical formula, as in this quote from the definitive O'Reilly book by Eric Meyer, where it says: H1 {color: red;}

Re: [WSG] guide to CSS inheritance

2004-08-10 Thread John Allsopp
John, Seeing this email reminded me of something. Yes, some CSS properties are inherited and some aren't. Inheritance depends on *specificity*, which can be reduced to a mathematical formula, as in this quote from the definitive O'Reilly book by Eric Meyer, where it says: H1 {color: red;}

Re: [WSG] guide to CSS inheritance

2004-08-10 Thread John Horner
[...] I know I've read an article also by Eric, which says that those nice numbers which make so much sense at first glance are not in base ten. I'm sure it was in his own personal website, but I can't seem to find it. I remember being puzzled by it at the time. If not base 10, then what?