RE: [WSG] Advert Banner, no validation.

Hi Genau Who puts the link into your (x)HTML? If the advertiser give you the link and you paste it into your page, you just need to make some minor adjustments. The validator tells you what the problem is: If you want to use a literal ampersand in your document you must encode

Re: [WSG] No skipping to content needed?

Ben Curtis wrote: Does it negatively affect anyone's browsing experience? Yes, it becomes a pain for those users who land on a page and actually want to get to the navigation quickly. Particularly if there's a lot of links and form elements in the main content section, they have to tab quite

Re: [WSG] No skipping to content needed?

Ben Curtis wrote: Content as in stuff, not satisfied. A lot of people put an in-page anchor at the top to skip navigation or skip to main content. Are there any hidden gotchas with simply putting the navigation last and positioning it first? All I have been able to interpret about proper

Re: [WSG] Fieldset and no form

No, it is not correct. You need to read the spec. Validators do not alert you if you have left form out, that's why it seems like you can use form controls anywhere... but the real question becomes why would you want to when there are so many other tags you can use. Terrence Wood. Cb2 Web

RE: [WSG] No skipping to content needed?

-Original Message- From: Ben Curtis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 5 December 2004 5:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] No skipping to content needed? A lot of people put an in-page anchor at the top to skip navigation or skip to main content. Are there any

[WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

Just a question... Why is there such an emphasis on NN4? Who actually still uses this? Don't say universities because they would update... So who actually uses it? Why is it more important to worry about NN4 than Konqueror or Safari? Is NN4 still avaliable for download anywhere but Evolt

Re: [WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

On 12/4/04 9:01 PM Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: Why is there such an emphasis on NN4? Who actually still uses this? Cash-strapped K-12 schools and other public agencies in the US have old, decrepit hardware and OSs that don't do well with more current browsers, for example.

[WSG] 2 Sites for Critique and Browser Comparison

I've reskinned these two sites with a few changes and was wondering whether they come up to par? I particularly don't have any Mac at the moment to test them out on so if anyone finds things wrong I can write them all down and address them when I can get hold of another one for testing.

Re: [WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 16:01:57 +1100, Chris Stratford wrote: Why is there such an emphasis on NN4? Who actually still uses this? Most developers won't need to worry about NN4 (ie the cost of the extra work required exceeds the probable return, given the small number in their market using it) A

Re: [WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

Until the last few months, the Australian Museum had around 80% of staff on Netscape 4. I know of other New South Wales (a state of Australia) Government departments who have the same issue. I guess it comes down to checking out the target audience for the particular site you are working on, then

Re: [WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

Wow thanks guys. Good responses. I wasn't sure if anyone would use it - with the way IE has spread - I assumed that everyone would be IE unless they chose something else... Thanks again! Chris Stratford wrote: Just a question... Why is there such an emphasis on NN4? Who actually still uses this?