Jack,
I use both PC and Mac. IE 6 on PC and IE 5 on Mac are different in the way they render identical pages.
Will Jensen
Moscow, Russia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 23, 2005, at 7:48 AM, John Horner wrote:
Can I add one more thing to the site review thing?
I often see people asking for their site
I'm wondering if any of you have any tips on creative ways to keep
spambots from harvesting email addresses on you page, and still keep
then accessable to diabled people and text-browsers. Here's my thoughts
If you only need to protect a small number of email addresses, there's
another
Good news, Barclays just went standards with their new website. Congrats to
them! Some work is still needed to fix all the validation errors, but at
least they are try! I would off course help them out if they give me a
shout. I hope more banks will follow their example soon.
Jacobus van Niekerk wrote:
Good news, Barclays just went standards with their new website. Congrats to
them! Some work is still needed to fix all the validation errors, but at
least they are try! I would off course help them out if they give me a
shout. I hope more banks will follow their example
You can get an overview how it works in WestCiv's CSS Tutorial here:
http://westciv.com/style_master/academy/css_tutorial/properties/values.html#color
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:30:53 -, designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
color : windowtext;
I understand (from my not very useful trawl of Google) that these are
systemnames.
What's this all about? Would it be useful, and if so, when?
I use it for SAMP tag to fake user's
It might be useful for custom form gadgets (slider).
Or WYSIWYG and similar interfaces.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion list for
Hi,
If I remember properly css2 was comming out with a :after that was
primarily inteded for clearing without having to add markup. What I was
wondering is what browsers (if any) support the property.
-Alan Trick
**
The discussion list for
Alan Trick wrote:
Hi,
If I remember properly css2 was comming out with a :after that was
primarily inteded for clearing without having to add markup. What I was
wondering is what browsers (if any) support the property.
-Alan Trick
**
The
I am not very font savvy but does anyone happen to know what Font is
this script font on the nav horizontal section of this page by Imaging,
Print and Interactive. http://www.tukaiz.com/home.htm
I would be eternally grateful.
Thanks.
--
Carmelyne Thompson
Web Architect/Developer
[EMAIL
It's due to the changes made in IE6 and IE7, and the stoppage of IE in Mac's.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:04:20 +0300, Will Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
I use both PC and Mac. IE 6 on PC and IE 5 on Mac are different in the
way they render identical pages.
Will Jensen
Moscow, Russia
Yeah, and will that work with all browsers?
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:30:15 +1100, Johnno Shadbolt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The work is a bit special though because I am using pure XML, somehow
turned to XHTML via XSL.
I'm not sure that using XML for a complete website is very wise,
oops wrong list sigh my apologies all. please ignore my previous post.
sorry admin.
--
Carmelyne Thompson
Web Architect/Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intricately.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I got a MYSQL error yesterday, I am not sure if you want to check
this. I also don't know if it has been reported yet...
--
Anthony Timberlake
Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
Thank you (all).
Does this mean that, if I emonlyem use systemcolors on a site, the site
will match the decor of the PC in question, and, appear differently
depending upon how the machine is set, or are the system colours 'constant'.
In other words, can I make a site be a good match for the
I've finally put the site up where it can be seen. Please don't be too
harsh...it's fairly basic, but it serves my client well (it's also
missing a real logo, etc). Anyway, enough excuses. :)
To repeat my question, I have an image of a bass player that I want on
the right side of the table,
Hi John
However, it's not showing up. Like I said, I'm sure it's some small
oversight on my part. Thanks for the assistance.
http://www.drzeus.net/clients/stevierays/
Fundamental issue, which was already hinted at by John D Wells:
the table has a background image but the cells all have a
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:16:55 +0100, Pat Boens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am new to Web Standards and I would like to know whether what I have
done
so far seems correct for the gurus.
Can you have a review of the following site, which I derived from
http://www.alistapart.com. The work is a bit
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:09:30 -0600, Carmelyne Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not very font savvy but does anyone happen to know what Font is
this script font on the nav horizontal section of this page by Imaging,
Print and Interactive. http://www.tukaiz.com/home.htm
I would be
That's it. Thanks to you and John. Now I have to make it more
transparent on that red background. :)
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 2/23/2005 3:49 PM Bert Doorn said the following:
Hi John
However, it's not showing up.
I hope I am not off topic again. Last night a web site I built using CSS
and mostly HTML (or is it XML) and a bit of PHP was officially launched. I
tried to keep to webstandards and would like some feed back after throwing
everything at the site including the kitchen sink. The URL is
I was just wondering if there was any plans to put the innerHTML
property into the DOM specs at some point seeing as how it is a very
useful property and most browsers support it anyway.
-Alan Trick
**
The discussion list for
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:25:37 -0800, InfoForce Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope I am not off topic again. Last night a web site I built using
CSS
and mostly HTML (or is it XML) and a bit of PHP was officially launched.
I tried to keep to webstandards and would like some feed back
Hi Alan
I doubt it, even though it is probable the fastest method, it goes against
the node-centric ways of the W3C DOM.
Even though it isn't in the W3C DOM spec, the browser manufacturers have
still implemented it, so it'll still work cross browser.
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
I use both PC and Mac. IE 6 on PC and IE 5 on Mac are different in
the way they render identical pages.
That's what I said! Perhaps I didn't express it very well.
There is almost no similarity at all between Mac IE and Windows
Explorer browsers, except maybe way *way* down there's a bit of old
Hi
I've got a 3-column page with footer:
#header {
position: relative;
background-color: #33ccff;
background-image: url(crest_banner1.jpg);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 100px;
border-bottom: 1px solid #fff;
z-index: 190;
}
26 matches
Mail list logo
