No replied after 13 days... yeesh. Was it that bad or that good? no
comments at all? worked perfect on everyone's computer/browsers?
here is the url again: http://ffxi.anime-madness.com
-levi
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:36:17 -0500, Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy, I've been coming signed up
Hi Levi,
Looks stable in Safari 1.2.4 and Mac/Firefox but the news inner containers
are missing their backgrounds in Mac/IE5.2.8. I can send screenshots offlist
if needed.
The other comments are accessibility ones so take them as you wish - they
may not be part of the mission for this site's
Standards advice is free.
But I charge for site reviews.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 04:52:55 -0500, Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No replied after 13 days... yeesh. Was it that bad or that good? no
comments at all? worked perfect on everyone's computer/browsers?
here is the url again:
Looks stable in Safari 1.2.4 and Mac/Firefox but the news inner containers
are missing their backgrounds in Mac/IE5.2.8. I can send screenshots offlist
if needed.
hmm. I dont know that screenshots will be needed, since I can pretty
much assume what you are talking about and know what it looks
Hello,
Still working on that photo gallery. :) I found a site that helped me
in creating a photo gallery I like, but I need to put a hover on the
thumbnails so that the user knows where they are. I'd like to have it
change the opacity, but a) I'm not sure how accepted that is amongst the
Hi
Sorry I'm unable to help with your question, but would you be so kind
as to pass along the url for developing a photo gallery in its current
incarnation.
C
On Wednesday, March 2, 2005, at 04:29 AM, john wrote:
Hello,
Still working on that photo gallery. :) I found a site that helped me
in
I was just reading through the Web authoring standards document at
http://www.htmlhelp.com/design/standards.html and I noticed the line
Authors MAY use any legal markup to determine document colours, but
SHOULD use RGB specifications to do so.
Does that mean that hex values or color names are
Alan Trick wrote:
I was just reading through the Web authoring standards document at
http://www.htmlhelp.com/design/standards.html and I noticed the line
Authors MAY use any legal markup to determine document colours, but
SHOULD use RGB specifications to do so.
Does that mean that hex values
I was just reading through the Web authoring standards document at
http://www.htmlhelp.com/design/standards.html and I noticed the line
Authors MAY use any legal markup to determine document colours, but
SHOULD use RGB specifications to do so.
Does that mean that hex values or color names
G'day
Alan Trick wrote:
I was just reading through the Web authoring standards document at
http://www.htmlhelp.com/design/standards.html and I noticed the line
Authors MAY use any legal markup to determine document colours, but
SHOULD use RGB specifications to do so.
Does that mean that hex
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:18:18 +1100, Peter Ottery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so I've designed myself a nice looking navigation scheme that displays
visually whereabouts you are within a site.
That's pretty. Pretty smart stuff.
Now I just need to work out how to sort out the css :)
I've some
Hi :-)
I just read the part of the XSL specification about modi on templates
but I have a probably quite stupid question: Is it somehow possible to
call-template ALL templates, no matter what mode they have set?
Or as an alternative: Is it somehow possible to use wildcards in a
call-template
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:01:06 -0500, Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Standards advice is free.
But I charge for site reviews.
Ha ha ha. I guess my wording was a little bad there. I am not looking for
anything like a movie review. more like a To examine with an eye to
criticism or correction type
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:29:19 +, john [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Still working on that photo gallery. :) I found a site that helped me
in creating a photo gallery I like, but I need to put a hover on the
thumbnails so that the user knows where they are. I'd like to have it
change
Thanks for pointing out the obvious to me (seriously) regarding looking
on his site. :)
I know it may be unnecessary, but I'd like to put a hover on them
anyway. Try as I might to understand the CSS better, it's still unclear
to me how to properly put a hover on the thumbnails. I've tried so
john wrote:
I know it may be unnecessary, but I'd like to put a hover on them
anyway. Try as I might to understand the CSS better, it's still
unclear to me how to properly put a hover on the thumbnails. I've
tried so many things that it's a jumble in my mind now...but it seems
like if I
a[href=http://www.foobar.com*] or a[href=*filename*]
CSS3 has ^= selector. (Look it up in
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/goingtoprint/ ...)
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for
It appears that gecko doesn't support that yet. I guess I'll have to wait.
Jan Brasna wrote:
a[href=http://www.foobar.com*] or a[href=*filename*]
CSS3 has ^= selector. (Look it up in
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/goingtoprint/ ...)
**
It appears that gecko doesn't support that yet. I guess I'll have to wait.
Exactly.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I like that idea.
This is kind of off topic but to you think that validation logos should
open in a new window, or not. Opening in a new window keeps people from
leaving the site, but popups are anoying and generally frowned upon.
designer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andy Budd
I need to put a hover on the thumbnails so that the user knows where
they are. I'd like to have it change the opacity, but a) I'm not sure
how accepted that is amongst the browsers
Modern Gecko supports the standard opacity:#.#; property.
Previous Gecko supports -moz-opacity:#.#; in the same
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:40:10 -0500, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that gecko doesn't support that yet. I guess I'll have to wait.
Gecko( mozilla1.7/firefox) and khtml(konqueror3.3.2) has support for
the different attribute selectors E[foo~=bar], E[foo^=bar],
E[foo$=bar],
Alan Trick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:55 AM said:
This is kind of off topic but to you think that validation logos
should open in a new window, or not. Opening in a new window keeps
people from leaving the site, but popups are anoying and generally
frowned
Does that mean that hex values or color names are not as good? Why?
I think it's the color names that are being shunned here, isn't it?
rgb(255,255,255) and #ff and #fff are all RGB colour specs, but
white isn't.
At 04:29 AM 3/2/2005, john wrote:
Still working on that photo gallery. :) I found a site that helped me in
creating a photo gallery I like, but I need to put a hover on the
thumbnails so that the user knows where they are. I'd like to have it
change the opacity, but a) I'm not sure how
Horst Gutmann wrote:
Hi :-)
I just read the part of the XSL specification about modi on templates
but I have a probably quite stupid question: Is it somehow possible to
call-template ALL templates, no matter what mode they have set?
I'm pretty sure that only one template can be used at any given
Hi all,
I've been reading this superb list (off and on) for a while now, but
typically, the first time that I speak up is to ask for something!!
I've set up a (currently rather small) site dedicated to a rather
interesting aspect of the early days of football (soccer, to those who's
football's
Everything is cool in FireFox (of course)
but no scroll bars in IE at
all!
Please help
Im supposed to upload this for my client TODAY.
THANK YOU
Problem page: http://www.manisheriar.com/livewrong/index.htm
CSS: http://www.manisheriar.com/livewrong/css/liveWrong.css
Oh, and while
Got the Product div
stuff figured out (had to do with applying display:inline
to the form which contained the add to cart paypal image). But still desperately need the scrollbar
help!
Thanks!
Mani
Sheriar
Sheriar Designs | www.ManiSheriar.com
925|914.0741
image001.gif
Please do not reply to this post.
Job opportunity: Sydney Australia - Optus
--
POSITION DESCRIPTION
--
3 month contract with possible extension available. Reporting to the
Senior Designer, the Web Designer will be joining the
It is the position:relative in the below that is
preventing the scroll bar. Try putting it in the body.
*
{margin:0;padding:0;position:relative;}
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mani
SheriarSent: Thursday, 3 March 2005 10:24 AMTo:
Is it somehow possible to call-template ALL templates, no matter what mode
they have set?
Are you sure you want use call-template? I have done a lot of XSLT and
have only ever used call-template when calling a specific template, so your
request sounds a little strange. Have you tried using
On Mar 2, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Ben Curtis wrote:
Safari/Konquerer supports -khtml-opacity:#.#; in the same way.
Behold the march of progress!
It appears that Safari now supports the standard opacity:#.#; call,
even though it is not listed here:
I trying do solve a selector (see
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/selectutorial/selectors_type.htm) that I'm
not sure can even be solved (without changes to my HTML)
I am using a bottom border on links for easier reading (compared with
underlines), but only want the border to appear on text links
how about
a img {
...
}
though i'd rather see
#nav a img {
...
}
See for more info ---
http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/css_tutorial/selectors/descendant_selectors.html
Cheers
Chris
RMW Web Publishing wrote:
I trying do solve a selector (see
Um.. Sorry I see what you are trying to do now.. I read that a bit too
fast the first time ...
Good question!
Chris Blown wrote:
how about
a img {
... }
though i'd rather see
#nav a img {
...
}
See for more info ---
At 09:34 PM 3/2/2005, RMW Web Publishing wrote:
I am using a bottom border on links for easier reading (compared with
underlines), but only want the border to appear on text links - not
images. Is there a why to set the style on a parent ('a') when you know
what the child is ('img')?
I believe
RMW Web Publishing wrote:
Is there a why to set the style on a parent ('a') when you know what
the child is ('img')?
No. And this is why CSS selectors suck and the W3C should have used
XPath (maybe with some syntactic sugar so you didn't need to type
descendant-or-self all the time to get all
38 matches
Mail list logo
