Today I installed a new version of HTML validator Firefox extension
(http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/) and went to search.msn.com.
I got green checkmark both on the start page and on results page --
checking with validator.w3.org confirms - MSN search are now valid
pages.
microsoft.com
See http://stopdesign.com/log/2005/01/31/msn-goes-css.html
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
In response to the earlier conversation:
Is it possible to put a css attributes on an elemtent that will respect
spaces, but still wordwrap? I tried copying the textarea css in
forms.css onto a test div and viewing it in firefox to se if that would
do it, but firefox controls it's textarea
Hi all,
This is my virgin post to this group after reading many months worth of
posts so hopefully somebody will give me the tweak I need here.
#container
#pageHeader
#headerLeft (where logo is bg-image)
#nav
#headerRight
#pageContent
#pageFooter
Keith: I'm so new at this I'm surprised to be answering, but one thing
that is wrong is that you don't have a proper doc type. you have
!doctype html public -//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en
you need to have it with the full uri. like such
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Keith Ellis wrote:
http://techvisioneer.com/clients/wshein/demo/admin/test/NewDesign.htm
I have a fairly simple header/content/footer layout except the
height of the logo in the header is greater than the desired height
of the header itself. My goal is to have the logo fixed in the upper
left
Georg,
I haven't tested this yet since I'm at the day job right now but why would I
need the margin style?
Keith
[ISO-8859-1] Gunlaug Sørtun writes:
Keith Ellis wrote:
http://techvisioneer.com/clients/wshein/demo/admin/test/NewDesign.htm
I have a fairly simple header/content/footer layout
Keith Ellis wrote:
Georg,
I haven't tested this yet since I'm at the day job right now but why
would I need the margin style?
Yes, that's what makes the whole thing work-- once you've made the
changes to your html-code. Those margins are repositioning the div back
to where it is in your original.
Nice, thanx. Can someone post more links from SXSWi?
I know about
http://www.happycog.com/clients/sxsw/ +
http://photomatt.net/2005/03/12/zeldman-keynote/
http://scribbling.net/sxsw05/
http://www.andybudd.com/sxsw05/
http://blog.fawny.org/category/events/sxsw2005/
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB ::
Photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jflint/
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on
http://joeclark.org/sxsw/
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
Hi, Sarah-
I printed out your test site because I thought it was so very clean and
attractive and I wanted to study your use of styles in creating it.
However, the page is wider than my printer's page size so some text is lost
along the left side. For instance, Checkout in the navigation
HelloMary,
use mozilla firefox : then use the "Fit to page" feature in print preview.
Dawesi
Tuesday,March15,2005,10:05:12AM,youwrote:
Hi,Sarah-
IprintedoutyourtestsitebecauseIthoughtitwassoverycleanand
attractiveandIwantedtostudyyouruseofstylesincreatingit.
At 03:05 PM 3/14/2005, Mary Ann wrote:
I see you have set the container width at 760px. Does anyone
know what is
the maximum number of pixels for page width in order to avoid truncating the
text along the left side of a print job? Even Microsoft's support pages
suffer from this same
Don't know the maximum number of pixels a page can have; it very likely
depends on the user agent. I would have thought the most robust way is to
have a fluid design; which led me to an idea--having a fluid design only in
the print media type :P I wonder if anyone's done that??
Or you could
On Monday, March 14, 2005 5:44pm, Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Don't know the maximum number of pixels a page can have; it very likely
depends on the user agent. I would have thought the most robust way is
to have a fluid design; which led me to an idea--having a fluid design
only in the print media
I know this might be slightly off toic, but the CMS listserv on WSG won't allow
me to subscribe:
Sorry, the mailing list cms@webstandardsgroup.org does not allow
subscriptions.
I'm currently part of a major project to roll out the ActiveMatter CMS. Now I'm
wondering if anyone has any confirmed
Hi Mary Ann
Seems as though everyone has pipped me to the post!
I printed out your test site because I thought it was so very clean and
attractive and I wanted to study your use of styles in creating it.
You (and others) may be interested in the following links which have helped me
with this
You are using them old command method to subscribe and this has been
disabled. Log into the WSG site and change your email prefs to include the
CMS list.
P
I know this might be slightly off toic, but the CMS listserv
on WSG won't allow
me to subscribe:
Sorry, the mailing list
Thank you, everyone-
Wow . . . you guys are great!
Mary Ann
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Sarah Peeke (XERT)
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 7:13 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Redundant Code
Hi Mary Ann
Seems as though
2. I have used a modification of one of Russ' tutorials for the #header and
#subnav - to float the
menu elements left and right. Is there a cleaner way to achieve this other
than to apply a class to
*every* li tag?
The most powerful way to achieve this (but not supported by IE) would be to
Hi Russ
Thanks very much for your reply.
The most powerful way to achieve this (but not supported by IE) would be to
use adjacent sibling selectors so no classes were used at all. For example:
#subnav ul li, #subnav ul li + li { background: yellow; }
#subnav ul li + li + li, #subnav ul li
I have subsequently used display: none; on the headers. Is this OK, or would
you recommend your
suggestion as being more standards-based?
display: none has known issues for screen readers:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/
The absolute method, which I have since heard referred to as
I keep seeing asterisks in the W3C spec but cannot see a glossary anywhere.
As an example, with the img element in xhtml 1.1, the attributes 'src' and
'alt' are both marked with an asterisk. Why?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_imagemodule
(I realise img is
Here are some:
Joe Clark's serialised book (covers all three - title, alt and longdesc)
http://joeclark.org/book/sashay/serialization/Chapter06.html
Writing good ALT text (covers all three - title, alt and longdesc)
http://www.gawds.org/show.php?contentid=28
The alt and title attributes (covers
http://blog.fawny.org/2005/03/13/sxsw2005-13d/
Transcript, commentary on first 30 mins or so of chat on accessible
flash..
Wish I could've gone to SXSW!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
26 matches
Mail list logo
