Wow. Some serious bedtime reading. Cheers.
Siggy
- Original Message -
From: russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Web Standards Group wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Asterisks in W3C spec
Here are some:
Joe Clark's serialised book
I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated in xhtml 1.1.
Does this mean that it will eventually be obolete? If so, what do they
expect us to do for inline styles because it doesn't always make sense
to have everything in an external style sheet.
Alan Trick
Alan Trick wrote:
I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated in xhtml
1.1. Does this mean that it will eventually be obolete? If so, what
do they expect us to do for inline styles because it doesn't always
make sense to have everything in an external style sheet.
Well, unless
Hi Alan,
I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated
in xhtml 1.1. Does this mean that it will eventually be
obolete?
It depends on what you mean by obolete. Deprecated means that it's part of
the spec but the construct is outdated and its use is strongly discouraged. The
next
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things on my webste though, and it
semes to make more sense to have something like [red] create a span
style='color:#f00'/span instead of a span class='red'/span and
have a whole bunch of unnecesary styles, and if I want to allow
something like [span
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:49:00 -, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things on my webste though, and it
semes to make more sense to have something like [red] create a span
style='color:#f00'/span instead of a span class='red'/span and
have a whole bunch
Hi Alan,
Both span class=red and span style=color:#f00 are bad. How about
BBtags this:
[important]
[highlight]
[note]
[misc]
then you use this markup:
em class=important
em class=hightlight
..
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xstandard.com
Alan Trick wrote:
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things
I tried Laura's link and it was not found.
Do you have an updated link for her site?
Then there is always Laura's mega resource:http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/accessibility.html#alt
Gloria AntonelliSigurd Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow. Some serious bedtime
The
link works if you make sure that the "ml#alt" part is added to the link (it
seems to break right after ".ht")
dawn
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Gloria AntonelliSent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:26
PMTo:
In answer to your question, Sigurd - the asterisk indicates that that
attribute is required for that elements (as opposed to optional).
For example, if you use the img you MUST include a SRC and an ALT
attribute for it to be valid.
Cheers :o)
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Sigurd
Thanks John!
.Cheers,
Jenny
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:33:20 -0500, John D Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jenny-
Welcome to the group! And welcome to the game of validation. . .
Before attempting to fix your layout problems, ensure that both your
XHTML and CSS validate by testing them here:
Partner sources say Microsoft is wavering on the extent to which it
plans to support CSS2 with IE 7.0. Developers have been clamoring for
Microsoft to update its CSS support to support the latest W3C standards
for years. But Microsoft is leaning toward adding some additional CSS2
support to IE
That article also says it will contain transparent Portable Network
Graphics (PNG) support, which is something I know I've been waiting
for.
On 16/3/2005, Nick Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Partner sources say Microsoft is wavering on the extent to which it
plans to support CSS2 with IE 7.0.
I am having problems floating an image in a div cell using css.
I want to have the whole page centered and static width. Then styling on
the wrapper div, with the image floating so that text will line up next to
it. Right now the problem is a gap under the image.
See the code below, its the
Hi MM,
I tested your page in safari quickly...The image is floating
correctly. Is the image being taller than the text messing your
problem?
There are many techniques to clearing your floats so that they won't
overflow like that. The simplest of which:
applying overflow: auto to the #wrapper
Looks appropriate in Firefox as well. What browser are you seeing the
issue with?
Diona
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 20:48 -0800, Jalenack wrote:
Hi MM,
I tested your page in safari quickly...The image is floating
correctly. Is the image being taller than the text messing your
problem?
There
Let the rain of hellfire begin! Though in the past, all they do is weave
more deceit and under-deliver on release. I read that MS decides to
introduce more bugs into IE7, and fix none from IE6. Joy.
Nick Lo wrote:
Partner sources say Microsoft is wavering on the extent to which it
plans to
17 matches
Mail list logo
