Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of
the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did! Why do negative margins
shift things around in a better way than positive ones?
**
The discussion list for
Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of
the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did! Why do negative margins
shift things around in a better way than positive ones?
Because negative margins pull, while positive margins push. And
everyone knows it's easier to pull
Adam Morris wrote:
Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of
the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did!
My fault - sorry. Yes, it should be a negative margin-left on the right
container :-)
Why do negative margins shift things around in a better way than
positive
On 11/17/05, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linking back to my philosophical question at the beginning: is web
development a subset of software development, or is it - for lack of a
better term - the development of an experience. A related point from
that: should web applications
On 11/18/05 2:16 AM James Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
I think part of the problem here is that
Great read. Thanks.
You have many valid thoughts, and you express them well. :-)
Rick Faaberg
**
The discussion list for
I've come accross an interesting (and painful) bug in IE6, when you
have padding on a link, and a background colour set, and then margin
to stop the link shifting, IE fails to draw the background over the
padding:
http://www.pixelcarnage.com/dump/rn.html
I've tried many things, including giving
Rowan Lewis wrote:
I've come accross an interesting (and painful) bug in IE6, when you
have padding on a link, and a background colour set, and then margin
to stop the link shifting, IE fails to draw the background over the
padding:
http://www.pixelcarnage.com/dump/rn.html
I've tried many
With apologies for cross posting.
Dear Friends,
For the many that know me, you will know that a post to any of the lists
I subscribe to on the topic of ACCESSKEY will automatically receive a
response from me. I think by now my position is abundantly clear on
this topic.
When I first heard that
Thanks George, for helping me give it layout.
But the top/bottom padding was an important part of the desired effect :/
Any idea how to do it?
On 11/18/05, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rowan Lewis wrote:
I've come accross an interesting (and painful) bug in IE6, when you
have
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
It is difficult to give a link layout, but 'zoom: 100%' will work.
Question: Which CSS standard defines the zoom property?
I don't see it in CSS2, nor in the CSS2.1 working draft. I
suspect it's a Microsoft invention and its use will invalidate
the CSS.
You could
Rick Faaberg
On 11/18/05 2:16 AM James Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sent this out:
I think part of the problem here is that
You have many valid thoughts, and you express them well. :-)
So what, most of the ramblings of Geoff and I posted were invalid
and badly expressed? ;)
Nah, just
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Thanks George, for helping me give it layout.
But the top/bottom padding was an important part of the desired
effect :/
Any idea how to do it?
Well, first you must set padding on the link - without hover - to make
it height-stable.
Then you can play around with some
Thanks for the links, Gunlaug. A great css step forward for me, this one!
Adam
On 11/18/05, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Morris wrote:
Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of
the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did!
My fault - sorry. Yes, it
On 11/18/05, Patrick Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Faaberg You have many valid thoughts, and you express them well. :-)So what, most of the ramblings of Geoff and I posted were invalidand badly expressed? ;)
Yes, please validate your next ramble with one of the W3C's online tools please :pI
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
for the record, I'm still following the thread.
this isn't even close to finished.
I think it's best if I take a time out and write a thorough article. If
it is a topic worthy of more discussion, I think that is the best way to
serve that purpose.
James Bennett wrote:
On 11/17/05, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linking back to my philosophical question at the beginning: is web
development a subset of software development, or is it - for lack of a
better term - the development of an experience. A related point from
that:
Does anyone have any experience with a bug in Firefox when using a:hover
{font-weight:bold;}?
When the cursor moves over the link, other elements on the page shift or
even flicker over other elements. Basically, the page is in chaos on :hover.
Fixes, suggestions, guesses appreciated!
its not to do with a bold font taking up more space and shifting other
elements?
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with a bug in Firefox when using
a:hover {font-weight:bold;}?
When the cursor moves over the link, other elements on the page shift
or even flicker over
also are you certain you have closed all your a tag's?
Charlie
http://www.bartlettdesign.co.uk
On 11/19/05, James Gollan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its not to do with a bold font taking up more space and shifting otherelements?Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with a bug in
its not to do with a bold font taking up more space and shifting other
elements?
also are you certain you have closed all your a tag's?
No, I wish it was this simple. I'm talking about elements that are
located on the other side of the page flashing above the link with the
hover.
I'll get
Hi all,
I'm using the standalone MSIE 5.01 and 5.5 from www.quirksmode.org to
tweak a design for IE5 and 5.5.
This went perfectly fine, the site looks great. However I have one
question:
Is it just me or don't these versions pick up conditional comments
for various older IE versions?
21 matches
Mail list logo
