Ryan Blunden wrote:
And of course, you would put any IE specific hacks such as the Holly Hack in
an 'ie-hacks' style sheet that would be included in your pages via IE
conditional comments.
See http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/10/12/480242.aspx for more info.
Not necessary if the IE team
1. to be able to write xml style markup in html. What I mean is, instead
of writing:
div id=wrapper
div id=content
blah blah
/div
/div
I could write:
wrapper
content
blah blah
/content
/wrapper
AND,
2. to be able to embed a font (or fonts) in an html page, without a
On Sunday 01 Jan 2006 7:00 pm, designer wrote:
1. to be able to write xml style markup in html. What I mean is, instead
of writing:
div id=wrapper
div id=content
blah blah
/div
/div
I could write:
wrapper
content
blah blah
/content
/wrapper
you can already
Bob,I doubt your first wish will ever happen since that's what XML and XSLT are for. Jon HenshawWeb Design, Usability SEOWeb Standards SEO Analyzerhttp://www.sitening.com/tools/seo-analyzer/Sitening110 30th Ave N #6Nashville, TN 37203-6320(615) 397-4960[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sitening.com/ On Jan
On 2 Jan 2006, at 8:00 AM, designer wrote:
You?
1. Browsers render/access/use link elements in the document head, so
(a) navigation can be implemented in the page header (like Lynx can),
(b) at an implementation level there is separation of global navigation
from content, and (c) browsers
1) MS donates IE to MoFo, who then discontinue it instantly
2) Opera goes open source
3) Executives of Sony BMG and RIAA do jail time for racketeering
4) All remaining browsers fully support XHTML 2.0
**
The discussion list for
Kenny Graham wrote:
1) MS donates IE to MoFo, who then discontinue it instantly
Like winning the lottery
2) Opera goes open source
Oh my, can it get any better than it is?
3) Executives of Sony BMG and RIAA do jail time for racketeering
Life without parole. :)
4) All remaining browsers
