Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] equal height columns
document:
trying again - this never arrived!
Original Message
Subject: equal height columns
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:42:04 +0100
From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Hi all,
I need some javascript/DOM help in setting a CSS height.
Quintin Stoltz wrote:
Instead of grid.offset.height, try grid.offsetHeight
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Designer
Sent: 16 April 2007 01:42 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] equal height columns
Hi all,
I need some
P.S. Beware - you may find IE hanging
Quintin Stoltz wrote:
Instead of grid.offset.height, try grid.offsetHeight
Thanks for pointing out my typo, but it still doesn't work! There's a
page you can see at:
http://www.rhh.myzen.co.uk/gam/sandbox/elc.html
--
Bob
The HTML XHTML definitive guide from O'Reilly states that NAME is a
required attribute in INPUT. Can I just substitute ID for NAME and still
adhere to web standards or is NAME really required? I'm coding for HTML
4.01 strict.
--
Marc Luzietti
Flagship Project
Bayview Financial, L.P.
(305)
Designer wrote:
http://www.rhh.myzen.co.uk/gam/sandbox/elc.html
The basics...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/d/Structure%20template.html
...but far from finished.
Now you have to ask IE/win how tall an em is - regardless of font-size
and resizing, and subtract the padding-top/-bottom on
http://www.rhh.myzen.co.uk/gam/sandbox/elc.html
Correction:
The em to px part of the calculation - needed for correct subtraction
of that padding, can be extracted here...
http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_14.html
...where I use it to simulate 'em-based min/max-width' in IE6. IE7
Greetings all,
I was hoping some of you fine Linux / Mac users could test this layout
to make sure no blowups happen. Everything SHOULD be fine, but you
never know.
http://homestead.foodzoomer.com/
Thanks a bunch!
--
*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design Development/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML XHTML definitive guide from O'Reilly states that NAME is a
required attribute in INPUT. Can I just substitute ID for NAME and still
adhere to web standards or is NAME really required? I'm coding for HTML
4.01 strict.
The name determines the control name
The name attribute is used to post the element's value to a new page,
where as id is used to identify the element within the document. You
want both regardless of the duplicate entry when creating the input
elements. If you had to leave one out, you would remove the id
attribute, leaving only
On 16 Apr 2007, at 20:17:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML XHTML definitive guide from O'Reilly states that NAME is a
required attribute in INPUT. Can I just substitute ID for NAME and
still
adhere to web standards or is NAME really required? I'm coding for
HTML
4.01 strict.
Name
I'm just at the beginning of a little experimentation, and already IE
stumps me.
Basically, trying to use a table in markup but hide one column and make
the other fall apart into individual inline cells. Try as I might,
though, IE doesn't seem to lose its desire to show the cells as a table.
I've tried this too, with no luck in IE. I was able to get FF and Opera to
play well.
=(
On 4/16/07, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just at the beginning of a little experimentation, and already IE
stumps me.
Basically, trying to use a table in markup but hide one column and
Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] equal height columns [No Protective Marking]
document:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:28:59 -0500
Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I was hoping some of you fine Linux / Mac users could test this
layout to make sure no blowups happen. Everything SHOULD be fine,
but you never know.
http://homestead.foodzoomer.com/
Thanks
I like the style and website, It matches the hotel but my only grip would be
that the links (besides the menu) does not have any hover attributes
apart from that top job :)
On 4/17/07, Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I was hoping some of you fine Linux / Mac
Tate Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:28:59 -0500
Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I was hoping some of you fine Linux / Mac users could test this
layout to make sure no blowups happen. Everything SHOULD be fine,
but you never know.
Also try http://browsershots.org/ to get a good overview of the site.
Its a nice site thou, handled fine with font resize
On 4/17/07, Tate Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:28:59 -0500
Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I was hoping some of
In future, you should consider installing a virtual machine with a
flavour of Linux so you can easily test your websites yourself, rather
than rely on someone elses perception.
any recommendations for a good no-hassle virtual machine?
(I hate waiting to reboot so I would much prefer a virtual
Tate Johnson wrote:
snip
In future, you should consider installing a virtual machine with a
flavour of Linux so you can easily test your websites yourself, rather
than rely on someone elses perception.
snip
You could also get hold of a copy of the APC March 2007 issue DVDROM
which includes
Hi Joseph
I have had a look at your site through my Mac OS X 10.4.9 browsers.
+ Opera 9.01 = looks fine.
+ Safari 2.0.4 = looks fine.
+ Firefox 1.5.0.6 = looks fine.
+ Internet Explorer 5.2.3 = Not good: Header imagery doesn't appear,
including top navigation and white slogan
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
Greetings all,
I was hoping some of you fine Linux / Mac users could test this layout
to make sure no blowups happen. Everything SHOULD be fine, but you
never know.
http://homestead.foodzoomer.com/
Thanks a bunch!
Everything SHOULD be fine, but you never
On Apr 17, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I'm just at the beginning of a little experimentation, and already
IE stumps me.
Basically, trying to use a table in markup but hide one column and
make the other fall apart into individual inline cells. Try as I
might, though, IE
23 matches
Mail list logo
