Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
2. If I don't include a dreaded hack in my css (which I'd really like
to
remove because my style sheet doesn't validate)
So use a Conditional Comment - ?
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 2 Jul 2007, at 3:10 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Paul Collins apparently typed:
I seem to be having trouble assigning the font-size:62.5%
Please note that...
Toldja.
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
Hi Nick,
I guess I was hoping to fix the problem(s), rather than just rely on a
hack. Other suggestions appreciated.
So use a Conditional Comment - ?
2. If I don't include a dreaded hack in my css (which I'd really
like to remove because my style sheet doesn't validate)
Sarah
--
On 2 Jul 2007, at 6:09 PM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
I guess I was hoping to fix the problem(s), rather than just rely on a
hack. Other suggestions appreciated.
Fair enough, but I'd say your chances of getting the one set of css
rules to display correctly in all browsers are pretty slim -
These solutions are interesting, but I'm only willing to spend time
looking at them if:
* Users without Javascript but with Flash can still view the movies
* I can integrate them with my CMS (Plone) -- I'll need to generate
the code dynamically
* I don't have to litter the body with Javascript
Seconded -- compared to all the other hacks you'll need to make when
coding for IE browsers, conditional comments are the least of your
worries; in fact they are your friend!
On 02/07/07, Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Jul 2007, at 6:09 PM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
I guess I
Paul Collins wrote:
The font stays slightly larger than 11px, when
I set it to 1.1em. this has worked fine on other sites, so not sure
why it isn't working here. Any ideas?
check that you haven't set a minimum font size in your browser preferences.
;)
Thanks for your replies everyone.
My target would be Firefox, Safari, IE, Opera. This seems to have
worked in the past on those browsers. It has worked fine for me in the
past.
Kepler, I tried adding it inline to the body tag, still can't get it
to work. Tony, I tried getting rid of the minimum
I think you missed the major point of the last reply - do you have any
evidence that what you are doing _does_ make things easier for AT users?
Many of the other good ideas that people have had, have been proved to
be counter-productive, such as access keys that conflict with OS
shortcuts. I have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Gleitzman
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 1:08 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Skip to Content?
On 30 Jun 2007, at 9:58 AM, Sander Aarts wrote:
So you don't care at all about
On 7/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious as to whether 'skip to' links are any use,
particularly when in multiples.
I can't speak for AT users per se, but it sure is helpful when
browsing on my mobile device (a Sony Ericsson V630i... not a PDA, so
scrolling is that
On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Tony Crockford wrote:
Why is the company logo and strap line the most important thing on
every page of a web site.
OR - why does most important *thing* on the page have to correspond
to h1?
Take a newspaper: arguably the most important *thing* on the front
Hi Andrew,
I would say the most important _thing_ in a newspaper is the title of lead
story for that part of the day. The analogy to a web document would be the
topic name of the page and be marked up as the h1. The name of the newspaper
itself doesn't offer any timely information or _news_.
Hi,
One thing usability studies HAVE found is that, when people are searching
for a particulsr item on the Web, they barely glance at the logo and tag
line.
What they do is scan the headers on the page. If they find an interesting
header, they'll speed-read the associated text to see if it's
On Behalf Of Frank Palinkas
I would say the most important _thing_ in a newspaper is the title
of lead story for that part of the day. The
I don't know why we're talking about Newspapers and/or Books here. This is
not print isn't?
There is not such thing that covers and front pages on the
IF you are doing user-centric design, then the question becomes What's the
most important part of the page to the USER? Once you look at it from
that viewpoint, then the company name is not the most important.
The company name has a visual importance for branding and keeping the
clients happy,
David Little wrote:
These solutions are interesting, but I'm only willing to spend time
looking at them if:
Seems like you are over-thinking it.
swfObject or UFO.
I personally prefer the latter mostly due to reasons I stated before
(cms... needing access to certain params for dynamic
Just a quick question.
Why we still coding/ hacking for IE5???
On 7/2/07, Sarah Peeke (XERT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nick,
I guess I was hoping to fix the problem(s), rather than just rely on a
hack. Other suggestions appreciated.
So use a Conditional Comment - ?
2. If I don't
Hi Jermayn,
Just a quick question.
Why we still coding/ hacking for IE5???
Good point.
It's just that the site works very well in IE5.5 *except* for this
problem - which, by the way, I've just about fixed.
Also, my website browser stats have IE5.x at about 2% - not much I know,
but when you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
I think you missed the major point of the last reply - do you have any
evidence that what you are doing _does_ make things easier for AT users?
I base that on research done by others (I'm not a researcher). For
instance
Sarah Peeke (XERT) schreef:
Hi Jermayn,
Just a quick question.
Why we still coding/ hacking for IE5???
Also, my website browser stats have IE5.x at about 2% - not much I know,
but when you also consider Opera, IE5 Mac and Safari also share 1-2% of
my audience each, then, by looking
Hello all,
Here's some front-end news from the Netherlands:
Yesterday, PPK announced that he and others are busy setting up a Dutch
guild of Front-end Developers:
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/07/gilde_van_front.html
(only in Dutch for now).
The general idea is to
22 matches
Mail list logo
