RE: [WSG] contentEditable

Ok, this is an in-house project so this may not be a problem but an excellent point. Robin Gorry Senior Web Developer Xplore Net Solutions Xplore.net Website of the Week: Weleda (Australia) - www.weleda.com.au Weleda has a range of anthroposophic medicine - the

Re: [WSG] contentEditable

The issue with this approach is that it is not part of a form - so the only way to submit it will be too use javascript which is an issue if javascript is not enabled. - Original Message - From: Robin Gorry To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 1:06 PM

[WSG] contentEditable

I am putting together an in-house application and I want to have editable areas on html template. I have come across what I think is a de facto standard across most browsers and that is the contentEdiatble attribute. I have tested it and it works in ff3, ie6 +, opera 9.52, windows safari 3.1.2.

[WSG] RESOLVED: Background-Image not displaying in IE5 & IE6

Thanks guys for the help - it worked. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristine Cummins Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:10 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Background-Image not displaying in IE5 & IE6 I have a div contai

Re: [WSG] Background-Image not displaying in IE5 & IE6

Kristine Cummins wrote: I have a div container that has a background image (gradation) which is displaying fine in IE7 & Mozilla, but it's not displaying in IE5 & IE6. http://www.cpwrehab.com/test/index.html On Sep 25, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Add... * html #container

Re: [WSG] Background-Image not displaying in IE5 & IE6

Kristine Cummins wrote: I have a div container that has a background image (gradation) which is displaying fine in IE7 & Mozilla, but it's not displaying in IE5 & IE6. http://www.cpwrehab.com/test/index.html Add... * html #container, * html #headercontainer { height: 1%; overflow: visible;

[WSG] Background-Image not displaying in IE5 & IE6

I have a div container that has a background image (gradation) which is displaying fine in IE7 & Mozilla, but it's not displaying in IE5 & IE6. Within that containing div with the background-image is a "content" div floating left with a "background-color: #fff", and a sidebar "background-color:tran

Re: [WSG] semantics of a simple "form"

is an aspx page, theres a form around the whole page, so theres not an individual one around this content block. ok i will use fieldset and legend. -best kevin Todd Budnikas wrote: i assume there is a tag wrapped around this you didn't include? Would obviously require that to qualify as a f

Re: [WSG] semantics of a simple "form"

On Sep 25, 2008, at 4:28 PM, kevin mcmonagle wrote: im not an expert on this but should there be a fieldset or legend around this? not even sure if it qualifies as a form, although it has a submit button. Check-in Date: 01 . Sep 08 . Check-out Date: 01 . Sep 0

RE: [WSG] semantics of a simple "form"

Personally I would say yes, the legend give vital information about what information is being request and the fieldset tells the users/browser/reader that the information with in it is linked together -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin m

Re: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

hi, Thats strange eBiz, The dropdowns are working over the flash in ff3 mac for me. Anyway im getting that or a very similar problem in safari so will def try your suggestion tomorrow. Actually the hover states are not even working in safari though so it might be another issue alltogether. Geo

[WSG] semantics of a simple "form"

im not an expert on this but should there be a fieldset or legend around this? not even sure if it qualifies as a form, although it has a submit button. Check-in Date: 01 . Sep 08 . Check-out Date: 01 . Sep 08 . -thanks in advance kevin **

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

hmm, drop downs are not showing up in safari either. I do have z-index defined so not sure what the problem is. #mainMenu li ul li { padding-right: 1em; width: 13em; text-align:left; text-indent:5px; border-bottom:solid 1px #fff; z-index:1002; } and also on the li ul { z-index:1002;} hmm E

RE: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

FF3, it only happens on the home page where the flash is, if you set your flash container to z-index 1 (assuming your using SWFobject) and you ul to z-index 99 then it will work in all browsers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin mcmonag

Re: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

Thanks, Only other services and local information have drop downs and they are showing up in ff3 for me. what version are you using? Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd wrote: Your top links aren't working in Firefox, the nav li's need a z-index to appear above the flash. *

RE: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

Your top links aren't working in Firefox, the nav li's need a z-index to appear above the flash. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun Sent: 25 September 2008 15:44 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] suckerfish proble

Re: [WSG] Is it a good/bad practise to have more than one same link url?

tee wrote: I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it here, however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it deserves a semantical perspective and wonder if it creates obstacle for screen reader. Might be seen as "noise", but can't see any other problems with otherw

Re: [WSG] Is it a good/bad practise to have more than one same link url?

im not an expert but i dont think it would help tee. dont think google favors duplicate content anymore. but i dont know. tee wrote: I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it here, however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it deserves a semantical perspective an

Re: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

kevin mcmonagle wrote: cheers george. i thought the !important; fixed that but apparently not. menus height ok in ie6, just have to give it a conditional comment for the width now. Suggest you add this "package" instead of something in a CC... #mainMenu li ul {padding: 0; } * html #mainMenu l

[WSG] Is it a good/bad practise to have more than one same link url?

I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it here, however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it deserves a semantical perspective and wonder if it creates obstacle for screen reader. In a content block (a teaser or a product for example) where you have an imag

Re: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

cheers george. i thought the !important; fixed that but apparently not. menus height ok in ie6, just have to give it a conditional comment for the width now. -thanks a mill kevin Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Sure, IE6 has no respect for declared dimensions - !important or not, and expands #mainMenu

Re: [WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

kevin mcmonagle wrote: Hi, Having a problem with suckerfish drowndowns, ie6 shows the nested lists expanded to the full height of all li's. Im doing the css for a programmer and im not sure whats going wrong. is it possible the javascript fix isnt being picked up? Im not doing that part of the

[WSG] suckerfish problem - ie6

Hi, Having a problem with suckerfish drowndowns, ie6 shows the nested lists expanded to the full height of all li's. Im doing the css for a programmer and im not sure whats going wrong. is it possible the javascript fix isnt being picked up? Im not doing that part of the programming. Anyone