[WSG] I am away on leave [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2008-11-05 Thread nathan.franklin
I am away on leave returning on Monday, 10 November 2008, if you have a request for Customs web admin please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards Nathan Nathan Franklin Web Admin | IT Applications | Australian Customs Service Ph: (02) 6275 6357 | http://www.customs.gov.au

[WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Brett Patterson
Are these away on leave notices from people who manage the webstandardsgroup.org site? Or individual people? It is kinda getting annoying? -- Brett P. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread David Fuller :: magickweb
Brett While I agree they can be annoying, they are quite a useful thing for normal circumstances. They are generally set up by the person who owns the email address (sometimes by their network admin etc). Basically say if you were going away for 2 weeks, but didn't want people thinking

RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Jennifer . Dawson
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from? document:

RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Dennis Lapcewich
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from? document:

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Brett Patterson
Oh. I have always just set mine up to not send out for specific e-mail addresses. Sorry, did not mean to exasperate the issue. I did not know it was one. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Just auto replies from list members away on leave (who have set their

RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Thierry Koblentz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Fuller :: magickweb Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:20 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from? Brett While I agree they can be annoying, they are quite a useful thing for

RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Christie Mason
Yep, but they're just a little less annoying than read receipts. Christie Mason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Lapcewich Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:41 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on

RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2008-11-05 Thread Chris Vickery
If you're using outlook just set up a rule. Something like... Where the subject line contains out of the office or autoreply then move it to (trash or junk mail or a subfolder) Works most of the time. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Brett Patterson
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from? document: wasChristie Mason received by: at:11/05/2008 13:41:14 _ Sorry, could not resist. ;) On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:48

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from? ADMIN THREAD CLOSED

2008-11-05 Thread russ - maxdesign
ENOUGH! THREAD CLOSED 1. the issue is something we are aware of. The entire mail system will soon be changing so this issue will no longer be present. Please be patient. 2. We have just had 13 people complain about it, on list, which has created more noise than the last month of real away on

Re: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2008-11-05 Thread Joe Ortenzi
yes, good point. I was making a subtle stab at the .htm versus .html discussion in here recently. but given my 'druthers, yes, I'd personally drop all file extensions in URLs completely if I could. Joe On 05/11/2008, at 4:04 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote: Joe Ortenzi wrote: the long and

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Joe Ortenzi
can we ask all Out of Office notification users to set their notices to only do this once per address per week (so repeated emails do not generate a mailstorm) rather than for each email received or perhaps get the mailing list itself to try and filter out the out of office replies. I

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Joe Ortenzi
this would be a useful and important addition to the mailing guidelines I would have to say, yes. Joe On 06/11/2008, at 8:47 AM, Brett Patterson wrote: Oh. I have always just set mine up to not send out for specific e- mail addresses. Sorry, did not mean to exasperate the issue. I did not

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Joe Ortenzi
Of course OOOR notices are important but it is a trivial matter to set a list of addresses or domains this notice does not affect OR to send the OOOR to each email address only once in a week, so the sender knows you're out but does not have to receive your notice everyday. Joe On

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2008-11-05 Thread Joe Ortenzi
but the point of IT is to make life easier. So it is the responsibility of the OOON setter to make heir OOON not mailstorm their lists and add more email to the already massive amount mail servers have to deal with. No to mention, this discussion would then be filtered out, so you

Re: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?

2008-11-05 Thread Dave Lane
Looking at list message headers, I see that it mentions Precedence: list as do most widely used list managers like the open source Majordomo and Mailman systems. Other lists use Precedence: bulk. According to RFC 3834, the Precedence header field is strictly not recommended, but says that