On 2010/07/21 11:47 (GMT-0400) agerasimc...@unioncentral.com composed:
> I agree - I usually set just the body font for something like 95%, and
> then the container font for 1em
> Is that a good solution?
Almost. 95% on body is telling users they've screwed up choosing their
browsers' defaul
I agree - I usually set just the body font for something like 95%, and
then the container font for 1em. I don't setup anything else, except if I
need something different for some .classes or #ids.
Is that a good solution?
Anya V. Gerasimchuk
Web Designer, IT - Web Shared Services
UNIFI Infor
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:58 PM, tee wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
>
> On 21 July 2010 11:52, tee wrote:
>>
>> EM can fail miserably in below senario for IEs for p, li and span tags due
>> to inheritance making them very tiny and unable to get consistence font s
On 7/20/10 9:58 PM, tee wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
On 21 July 2010 11:52, tee mailto:weblis...@gmail.com>> wrote:
EM can fail miserably in below senario for IEs for p, li and span
tags due to inheritance making them very tiny and unable to get
consistence font
It's still a bit hard to tell without seeing an example. Can you send
a link to a cut down version of what the problem is?
Thanks
Russ
On 21/07/2010, at 3:31 PM, Jayachandran Kandasamy wrote:
Hi Russ,
I tried these CSS 3 properties and tested in the IE7 and Mozilla FF
3.6.6 browser, they
HI ,
I am developing a sire for blackberry. I have a rounded corner button style for
all the buttons. I have used the sliding door technic for this.
the xhtml + styles for my button is like this
submit
.button { background:transparent url(../images/buttons.png) no-repeat scroll
left -32px;
