Re: [WSG] Fixed-position menus?

On 11/24/10 7:06 PM, Thierry wrote: Thanks, Thierry; Could you expound a bit on what evil these CSS expressions might bring on? Are we talkin' red guys with horns, tails and pitchforks? Worse than that! Check this: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2007/07/high_performanc_6/ -- Regard

Re: [WSG] Fixed-position menus?

> Thanks, Thierry; Could you expound a bit on what evil these CSS expressions > might bring on? > > Are we talkin' red guys with horns, tails and pitchforks? Worse than that! Check this: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2007/07/high_performanc_6/ -- Regards, Thierry www.tjkdesign.com |

Re: [WSG] Fixed-position menus?

On Nov 23, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: How key is IE 6, and are people simply not going with this kind of fixed menu? You can use the following for IE6, but be aware that CSS expressions are evil! #elementToBeFixed { position:fixed; } * html { background: url

Re: [WSG] Touch screens

Just in case anyone is interested, I ditched the spry menu and found that the simple 'son of suckerfish' menu works fine on the iPad. Bob - Original Message - From: tee To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:58 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Touch screens

Re: [WSG] Fixed-position menus?

http://thinkplan.org/menupersist.jpg What are peoples' thoughts on this kind of menu? I'm told that IE 6 doesn't support this kind of menu...IIRC, it involves position: fixed; I use "fixed" menus... ...and reconfigure to scrollable on narrow windows -

Re: [WSG] Fixed-position menus?

On 23 Nov 2010, at 21:05, cat soul wrote: > Here is a link illustrating what I mean: > http://thinkplan.org/menupersist.jpg > > What are peoples' thoughts on this kind of menu? It eats valuable vertical screen real estate (very important in these days of widescreen netbook computers) and brea