Sorry, forgot to mention that with the change from the alone to using the amp; did allow validation under XHTML 1.1. AND, the link did go to the shopping cart page at Opera web site.
Now to that question - will the Opera server correctly record the transaction for affiliate credit? Or does the
Will Jensen wrote:
I am concerned that if someone uses the 'corrected' link to go to the
Opera site, that the use of amp; will cause an error in the
affiliate ID registration process... Or is this just foolishness on my
part?
The only foolish question is the one that's not asked, although the
Thanks to Bert and Jeroen - It all 'just works.' Have a merry one!
Will Jensen
Moscow, Russia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 24, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Bert Doorn wrote:
Will Jensen wrote:
I am concerned that if someone uses the 'corrected' link to go to the
Opera site, that the use of amp; will cause an
If this is off-topic - Just let it die for lack of reply!
I have an 'affiliate' link on my web site for the Opera browser (And, yes for Firefox, Mozilla and Netscape as well).
The problem is that the link does not validate in XHTML 1.1.
This same problem shows up on many other sites using
Will Jensen wrote:
The problem is that the link does not validate in XHTML 1.1.
This same problem shows up on many other sites using affiliate links
for all kinds of products, not just for Opera.
It's a very common problem and I believe the validator gives you a link
that explains how to fix it,
Bert and Jeroen,
Thanks, I did go to the link at W3C on ampersands. That is what triggered the query.
I am concerned that if someone uses the 'corrected' link to go to the Opera site, that the use of amp; will cause an error in the affiliate ID registration process... Or is this just foolishness