Re: [WSG] All is not well...

2005-11-18 Thread Adam Morris
Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did! Why do negative margins shift things around in a better way than positive ones? ** The discussion list for

Re: [WSG] All is not well...

2005-11-18 Thread Christian Montoya
Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did! Why do negative margins shift things around in a better way than positive ones? Because negative margins pull, while positive margins push. And everyone knows it's easier to pull

Re: [WSG] All is not well...

2005-11-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Adam Morris wrote: Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did! My fault - sorry. Yes, it should be a negative margin-left on the right container :-) Why do negative margins shift things around in a better way than positive

[WSG] All is not well...

2005-11-17 Thread Adam Morris
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/live5/ In IE, when the window is shrunk, the content block drops underneath the logo image (ugly). Why does that happen when, in FF, it stays in position and compresses nicely? Also, in IE, there are gaps between the border images. Again, in FF, a nice smooth line.