PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Definition list wish
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:20:35 -, P.H.Lauke wrote:
What's wrong with
ul
li
dl
dtAlbatross/dt
ddA sea bird/dd
ddA tasty snack at the movies/dd
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:56:37 -, P.H.Lauke wrote:
And how, in that case, is the use of UL bad ? Sure, UL is
generic, but it does get semantic meaning from its constituent
list items, in this case definition lists.
Or are we splitting hairs here ?
I think we are splitting hairs, so which
Robert Moser wrote:
Consider this: you want to put a border around all your individual
terms, some of which might have multiple definitions. Using some pretty
esoteric CSS3 selectors you might be able to do it, but for the most
part, you're just out of luck.
...
Then you could have
What would the process be for making such a change?
Sign up to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. But a word of warning, be ready to have
your idea ripped to shreds. Don't be dishearted by this process, every idea
is ripped to shreds on that list - the good ones come through the other end
and are
Tonico Strasser blurted out:
Robert Moser wrote:
Then you could have something like this:
dl
dli
dtAlbatross/dt
ddA sea bird/dd
ddA tasty snack at the movies/dd
/dli
dli
dtSwallow/dt
ddCoconut delivery system/dd
/dli
/dl
What about:
dl
dtAlbatross/dt
ddA sea
