Hello all,
Can someone point me to the latest and greatest method for adding Flash
to a page. Also, adding alternate content to a Flash element. Can the alt
content be an image?
Off list if you think it's best...
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/ufo/
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
Hi,
Greatest is always debatable in this vocation latest, as current as
the next query by a news aggrigator, but here goes one of the best
methods I've found:
(http://blog.deconcept.com/flashobject/)
C
On Sep 13, 2005, at 8:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello all,
Can someone point me
] Flash elements
Hello all,
Can someone point me to the latest and greatest method for adding Flash
to a page. Also, adding alternate content to a Flash element. Can the alt
content be an image?
Off list if you think it's best...
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
Best I ever have seen:
http://blog.deconcept.com/flashobject/
Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions
www.bkdesign.ca
- Original Message -
From: Jan Brasna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Flash elements
http
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello all,
Can someone point me to the latest and greatest method for adding
Flash to a page. Also, adding alternate content to a Flash element. Can
the alt content be an image?
Off list if you think it's best...
Thanks!
here's one from, i think, this list:
Dwain, please read the preceding replies before posting, this was
already mentioned, and it is one of the older and not the top notch
solutions.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for
Jan Brasna wrote:
Dwain, please read the preceding replies before posting, this was
already mentioned, and it is one of the older and not the top notch
solutions.
sorry, i read what i had and replied. what then would be a more
standards way of it?
dwain
--
dwain alford
[EMAIL
sorry, i read what i had and replied.
No problemo ;) It was just mentioned by Ted before.
what then would be a more standards way of it?
It's not abou being more standardised, but rather more compatible,
effective, flexible etc. ... See the replies for them.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB ::
Jan Brasna wrote:
It's not abou being more standardised, but rather more compatible,
effective, flexible etc. ...
Worth a read from an accessibility angle:
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/accessibility/archives/2005/08/in_search_of_a.cfm
--
Patrick H. Lauke
10 matches
Mail list logo